Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In An Article Titled "which Nfl Teams Got Worse This Offseason?"...


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

The Panthers are mentioned...:

Yesterday, we stopped lamenting the end of the NFL's acquisition season by detailing how 10 teams had sufficiently upgraded their weakest spots in the lineup. Plaudits were handed out, compliments were given, and we even found a nice thing to say about the Browns taking a running back third overall. All in all, it was a day of high praise.

Today, though, brings the natural counter to that piece: the 10 teams who failed to address their biggest holes this offseason.

Carolina Panthers

Hole Remaining: Wide Receiver

As is their custom, the Panthers made another one of their veterans feel at home with a massive contract extension, thanks to the new deal Steve Smith got in April. What they left undone for yet another year, though, is the question of who will benefit from the combination of Smith and Cam Newton in 2012. The Panthers hope that it's Brandon LaFell, who caught 36 passes and scored three times last year, but LaFell works best as a matchup problem for undersized defensive backs and might not be a complete receiver. The Panthers may also hope that David Gettis recovers well from his torn ACL, but it's a shame that the Panthers didn't take a flyer on any veteran wideouts in free agency.

I've never heard of this "Grantland" website, but it was linked from the ESPN NFL main page. They seriously thought a #2 WR was our biggest hole? That's gotta be the most ridiculous claim I've heard about the Panthers this entire offseason...sure we don't have a concrete proven #2 right now, but we're far better at WR than DT or CB, that's for sure. Lafell and Gettis have proven more than Hogan and Norman and Butler...

http://www.grantland...-this-offseason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers are mentioned...:

I've never heard of this "Grantland" website, but it was linked from the ESPN NFL main page. They seriously thought a #2 WR was our biggest hole? That's gotta be the most ridiculous claim I've heard about the Panthers this entire offseason...sure we don't have a concrete proven #2 right now, but we're far better at WR than DT or CB, that's for sure. Lafell and Gettis have proven more than Hogan and Norman and Butler...

http://www.grantland...-this-offseason

That's where you went wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree too much again is on Smith shoulders. He is too big of a piece to the passing puzzle.

We still don't have our talent on offense distributed well. Lot is talented guys will be on the sidelines since they are runners

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can Smith continue at the level he showed last year? Will Gettis be 100% and can he be as good as some of us think he can? Will Lafell continue to improve as he did last year? And will Olsen and Barnidge be a good pair at TE? The receiving corps does have some questions, but if all or even most of them get answered in the affirmative, we should be in pretty good shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's worth noting that we started playing something that looked like football after going down 17-0 against the Dolphins.  Up to that point we had rushed the ball 3 times and Bryce had two turnovers.   Then we ran it 5 straight times with Rico and he started cracking off some big gains and led to our first touchdown.  Another 37 yards of rushing later, Bryce goes 1 yard complete, incomplete, incomplete to get that field goal before halftime.  Then we committed big time to the run in the second half and played some really nice complimentary football.  The Panthers had stumbled on a formula, and it started with Rico being crazy productive.  Something they only learned because Chubba was injured and Bryce started that game so poorly they were forced to lean on Rico. Fast foward to Dallas, they essentially lean into the same game plan against the Cowboys and I think everyone was surprised by how quickly it started to look complimentary.  In my opinion the productive offense really helped the defense as well.  We played quite solid against a top offense. Finally we make our way to the Jets and Bills, Chubba's return.  You can't say the low scoring affair and return to ineffective football against the Jets was all on Chubba, they were indeed a better defense and so was Buffalo.  But the production difference between the two backs in both games was both visually and statistically obvious.  The bigger picture is the offense took a major step back as well.  They are other moving parts and it's isn't all one thing, BY9>Dalton by a decent margin at this point.   But yeah, Rico's vision and athleticism is just better than Chubba and it jumps at you.
    • First day in 3 weeks my pain started to dwindle just a tiny bit.  Got switched from hydrocodone to post-shingles pain patches.  My insurance refused to pay for my patches as I’m too young for shingles per them.  I also need a prescription to get shingles shot and insurance also won’t pay for it even thought I just had shingles and in high risk to get it again.
×
×
  • Create New...