Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Can't I Start A Topic....


Zod

Recommended Posts

Cool. Thanks Zod. I mostly read everything thats going on in here. And yes I venture over to the Lovely Ladies section so see what nc_Biscuit, jangler, and few others has for us on that particular day. As for the elders forum. Good for those of you that post all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, Zod, I think that you are moving in the right direction. Not to question your management of your own site, but 50 really seems more symbolic than an actual deterrence to stupidity. It seems like it would have to be at least double that number to give a person time to really get a feel for the site, and would be a prohibitive barrier to just posting to get their count up.

Now, not so seriously, an elders forum just seems like something that one would have to be voted into. Ultimately I think that it's unnecessary, as Mods are virtual elders already. If Mods don't have their own space to go to to kick around ideas, problems (or problem people), or perhaps improvements or issues regarding the Huddle, then perhaps you should play around with that idea. IMHO, anything more seems excessive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean by getting the feel of the place they learn to be sarcastic, a$$ holes, better than thou, belittling of others, know it all’s and not to forget bad spellers? Then yes they need more time.

I feel you, but there wouldn't be a forum without all the different opinions and personalities. Just like in life, sometimes you have to take the bad with the good. Sometimes perception and reality are two different things. Sometimes people are just gonna have a bad day. As for bad spelling and/or grammar, that is something that can easily be overlooked (unless one just wants to be anal about it, i.e. an asshole). When I first came to the site many moons ago (even before the great purge of 2008), I used to take things too personally but was admonished by a few of the "elders" not to take things so personally, or that I would never last. I took their advice in stride, developed a thicker skin, and learned to deal with assholes by being one (if I deem it necessary). If nothing else, a little more time would give newbs a chance to toughen up and/or determine whether or not they really want to subject themselves to the fray. Moreover, use of the ignore function can be a huddlers best friend. The post count should be a means to deter trolls more than anything else. In my perfect world, the mods should be there to deal with the personal attacks of assholes (not necessarily saying that they don't).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...