Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Mini Camp Thread....(updated Sunday)


Zod

Recommended Posts

its not the mistakes its that connor is younger and can be better than him..to me it would be a waste for him just to sit on the bench as a backup MLB

Maybe Connor can be better than Diggs in the future, but until he proves it on the field, Diggs should be the starter. And looking good in one mini camp practice does not qualify as proving it on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What defensive scheme are they running?

i only saw about 5-10 mins of "scrimmage" time and i would assume cover 2. the db's were playing off and barnadge(sp) was getting a lot of receptions over the middle. the wr's were also working the short routes a lot, but imo, the day was very lax and not too intense. what i mostly saw was position groups working amongst themselves rather than 11-on-11 play. also, for those that were there, where are fox and meeks at? i saw the position coaches but don't recall seeing either coordinators or fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Connor can be better than Diggs in the future, but until he proves it on the field, Diggs should be the starter. And looking good in one mini camp practice does not qualify as proving it on the field.

i know this but he should at least get the opp on the left side...instead of just going in as the backup in the middle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Johnson was Diggs backup, and Connor was playing the weak side behind Davis last year?

Johnson was Diggs backup last year, I can't remember where Connor was but I thought coming into the season he was listed as the backup MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys forget during this Diggs/Connor argument that Fox favors starting veterans.

I favor starting Vets too. Why fix it if it aint broke? Man Diggs might be old but the dude played very well last year and also was on ST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...