Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Do We Have So Many Wrs And Tes On Our Roster?


jarhead

Recommended Posts

Competition I would think. Don't get me wrong, but Gettis isn't a for sure option. So far just Smith and LaFell are the only WR's we know for sure how can bring something to the table. Packers are ready to keep 6 WR on the roster.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/30/mike-mccarthy-suggests-packers-could-keep-six-receivers/

“The way we play, you could make a legitimate argument for six receivers … Our roster will be challenged as far as six receivers.

So Im thinking we want to carry about the same, especially since we wanna get more WR's involved taking shots downfield. So we let Naanne go, so that opens up an extra potential spot. We have Smith, LaFell, Gettis, Adams and Pilares, the last are mainly ST, so Im thinking we trying to find a diamond in the rough, and also be able to retain some practice squad guys, in case of injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not unusual to see a lot of receivers going to camp.

Between routes, drills, special teams work and other things, these guys do a lot of running.

Plus sometimes they just need extra guys for quarterback drills, preseason play and other things. Sometimes they'd prefer to just rest the starters and let the scrubs do that stuff.

Granted there could be deeper reasons, but it doesn't necessarily mean anything by itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Kalkbrenner and Sion James received regular contracts and not two ways, so the Hornets have some work to do to cut the roster size down. 
    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
×
×
  • Create New...