Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vote To Remove Rep


jtnc

Remove rep  

106 members have voted

  1. 1. Remove rep?

    • No
      48
    • Yes
      42
    • Pie
      21


Recommended Posts

I voted no but I wouldn't mind getting rid of neg rep. We shouldn't abuse people just for having different opinions. We can still ban obvious trolls.

To me it's a matter of honor. You shouldn't neg rep someone just because they have a different opinion, but sometimes assholes do it. To me It is paramount to trolling, which most of us hate. Furthermore, if you are going to neg-rep someone, be man enough to admit it and explain why. To me, rep is just a cool feature that adds to the swag factor of the Huddle. But, I suppose that pie will suffice.

Other than retaliating because of an asshole one time who neg-repped me because I responded to someone else's post (in the Cam Newton statue thread that jtg started, which makes me wonder if jtg neg-repped me also), I have only given neg-rep one time, and that was the "Mike Wallace is dead" thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kanon Tipton

To me it's a matter of honor. You shouldn't neg rep someone just because they have a different opinion, but sometimes assholes do it. To me It is paramount to trolling, which most of us hate. Furthermore, if you are going to neg-rep someone, be man enough to admit it and explain why. To me, rep is just a cool feature that adds to the swag factor of the Huddle. But, I suppose that pie will suffice.

Other than retaliating because of an asshole one time who neg-repped me because I responded to someone else's post (in the Cam Newton statue thread that jtg started, which makes me wonder if jtg neg-repped me also), I have only given neg-rep one time, and that was the "Mike Wallace is dead" thread.

That's the irony. I commented that Beason needed to be quiet & worry about winning games & JT got mad & started negging every post I made. Then when I negged him back for laughs he ran to Zod crying & had me banned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the irony. I commented that Beason needed to be quiet & worry about winning games & JT got mad & started negging every post I made. Then when I negged him back for laughs he ran to Zod crying & had me banned.

Not true at all, you were in the red at LEAST 3 times for one post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we have everyone playing like they should, we can win the Cup. That has been the biggest problem when we get to the playoffs, but this year seems to be fixed mostly. We could have had multiple if we had done this in the past.
    • Here we go Bryce Stan’s you should love this. Hell it may be one of you.  It has every cliche excuse and then some.  Unintentionally hilarious my limit was reached when he said Bryce had it hard because four play callers. 
    • Luke goes in to the specifics of what he looked to accomplish in joint practices.  Basically they may work with someone on the opposing team to stress something they feel is a weakness in their own game in a different way that can be done with someone they are familiar with. That they can have predetermined stresses but since neither wants to get injured and it has absolutely no bearing on anything there is not the level of concern that would be in a preseason game.  He would also even chat with opposing OC.   It seems like an interesting nuance among the vets and savy pros.    
×
×
  • Create New...