Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next Xbox and Playstation to Block Used Games


Wyank

Recommended Posts

Xbox Link

Additionally, a "reliable industry source" tells Kotaku that Microsoft's Next Xbox may incorporate a system that blocks gamers from playing used titles. Further details concerning the implementation of such a system were not offered.

PS3 Link

Buckle up, Sony enthusiasts. A tipster has told Kotaku that the PlayStation 4 is named "Orbis" and that it will feature an anti-used-game system, offer no backward compatibility with PlayStation 3 titles, and ship in holiday 2013. As for the first part of the rumor, multiple sources told the blog that the Orbis will sport some sort of anti-used-game measure. Full Orbis games will be available via Blu-ray disc or as a PlayStation Network download and will be locked to a single PSN account. Players will not be able to circumvent the system by remaining offline, as the source said users will be forced to be connected to the PSN to boot up their games.

Both will require user to be always online to play games as well. Link above for next Sony product already states this.

Xbox Link

Gamers will need an Internet connection to play next-generation Xbox titles, if a report proves accurate. VG247 cites sources who claim the next Xbox will require a constant Internet connection as a method of fighting piracy. No further information concerning this was offered.

There's other info on the systems coming out like 720 will come with blue ray drive and kinect 2. Expected release dates of holiday season of 2013. But the blocking of used games might be a deal breaker for me. I like buying used games. I like selling my new when bought games to get back some of that $60. Just not fond of where this is going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will kill their own business. The only way people stomach spending $60 on a game is to know they can recoup some of it towards a future purchase. I personally will stick with my ps3 because the best part is playing games when I don't have access to internet. Gamestop is going to die from this. Smaller local places will thrive selling old consoles and old games.

I've really become disgruntled with the entire gaming industry. It started as a bunch of nerds enjoying a passion. But those small nerd companies needed investments from big business and it became about money. I bought a used copy of ncaa 11' because it had Cam Newton in it. To gain online access was $10 because it was used. To open all of the features was going to be another $30. Opening features should be done by in game achievement, not money. There is nothing worse than realizing you just bought a bad game. That is why I rarely if ever buy games these days. If Nintendo really wants the Wii U to bring the company back to glory they should allow used games on their network. That will give them an edge they haven't had since the N64.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like selling my new when bought games to get back some of that $60.

The $60 price point drives me nuts because not all games are created equal. Madden has been running the same engine for 10 years. They tweak it a little each year but their development costs are very low compared to a stand alone game like Uncharted 1. I bought this Xmen Destiny game and it was a got damned joke. Any college kid could have made this game in his dorm room and it cost as much as an epic title like Zelda Skyward sword. A lower quality game should start at $20. You wouldn't pay the same price for New Balance as you would for Jordans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if you have to be online the entire time, what's to stop them from implementing a system that cuts off the ability to play older games, i.e. cutting off Madden 12 once Madden 13 comes out, etc? Not sure I'd put it past the companies at this point. The move towards "licensure" from "ownership" continues to have horrible implications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...