Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Boxing verse MMA, who really is the best PFP


Iceberg Slim

Recommended Posts

I had this argument with a friend of mine the other day. I like alot of others have become dis-enchanted with the world of boxing and have now started paying more attention to MMA. Before I would have said Floyd Mayweather was the best pound for pound but now after watching Anderson Silva fight this weekend and then going back to look at some of his fights in the past, I have come to the conclusion that he is the best pound for pound.....

Thoughts????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boxing is a joke.

All the talented guys are starting in MMA now and the future is only looking brighter. No one goes to the gym to box unless you come from some shitty part of some shitty country that can't afford gear for MMA.

Boxing is dead. MMA has all the talent. JDS, Bones Silva, Aldo, GSP, Condit, Diaz, Cain, Cormier, and the list goes on and on and on, leaving out all the lightweights because there are too many to name.

So many good, complete fighters in MMA, no idea why you'd watch two guys play patty cake for 12 rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boxing is a joke.

It is now with out a doubt. The Iranian government has more credibility than the WBC.

Mayweather/Pacman is probably never going to happen. Pacman was screwed in his last fight and that honestly may have been the final deathblow to the sport. I moved on years ago.

Used to be a big boxing fan. But it is a dead sport and UFC is the future. Many of my friends are UFC nuts and I've slowly developed a taste for it but strictly for entertainment purposes and honestly don't give a sh1t who wins. I do like Roy Nelson, though. I've watched every PPV the past 2 years except a few. Missed Saturday's because I drank too many beers at the pool during the day but I heard I didn't miss much.

I can tell you this, if you want to see some really trashy people, head up to any bar in the LKN area during a big UFC fight. Gross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This past card was pretty weak because Dana knew it would sell a ton with just Chael and Anderson.

I have many friends who love it now but hated it earlier because they thought it was gay dudes rubbing on each other. All it took was one session on the mats to truly understand how hard they are working for every position and they had new found respect for it. It's like any sport, the more you know about it, the more you'll enjoy watching it because you understand what's going on.

Roy Nelson is a beast, would love to see him at 205 though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big fan of pre-2000 boxing. It doesn't even compare now.

MMA, to continue growing, can't be reluctant to change and improve, though. It borrows too much from boxing, like the 10 point must system, and the judges who often literally have no idea what's going on in the cage and couldn't tell you the name of a single move. But that's more up to the commissions, and not the UFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily. I boxed for a while, and I know a lot of really talented kids that chose it over this new MMA phase.

Then they aren't that talented or they are really dumb. Anyone with half a brain can see MMA is taking over and if you walk into a gym and only train your hands, you aren't going anywhere.

1. Throw them in a wrestling class

2. Let them work their hands after that

3. Learn to throw leg kicks halfway decent.

4. ????

5. Profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then they aren't that talented or they are really dumb. Anyone with half a brain can see MMA is taking over and if you walk into a gym and only train your hands, you aren't going anywhere.

1. Throw them in a wrestling class

2. Let them work their hands after that

3. Learn to throw leg kicks halfway decent.

4. ????

5. Profit.

Well granted, these are almost exclusively inner city kids and the gym is in a bad part of the city, and I dunno if we even have an MMA gym around here.

One of the kids is a multi time state champion boxer, so I'm sure if he really wanted to make the switch, he would. Boxing is more appealing IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find both to be great sports and something, if I have a son someday, that I would get my son into. Rigorous activity that teaches discipline and respect that isn't matched by anything except maybe football (and this is coming from a football coach). To me, I'd rather watch MMA if both were on TV. Boxing is all well and good, but since MMA has taken off, it seems mostly irrelevant. Boxing is but a part of MMA, and I think it's pretty common knowledge that a boxer couldn't just come in to the world of MMA as easily as an MMA fighter could come into boxing. Of course, that is a bit obvious, since the MMA guys (for the most part) already have a decently strong boxing background as well as the ground game; whereas a boxer would need more than a few months to get his ground game to the same level of a decent MMA fighter. A guy like Liddell in his prime could train for a few months for a boxing match and probably win it, since he was one of the better strikers in MMA and he'd be focusing his training for months on ONLY the best part of his game.

On the whole, I'll take MMA any day. However, I have respect for both sports. MMA is more exciting though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two different things. Put the best stand-up MMAer against the best boxer and the MMA guy gets beat. But the best take-down MMAer against the best boxer and the boxer gets beat. They've already done it, but without marquee fighters. Randy Couture beat a boxer. Then some boxer beat the crap out of Tim Sylvia. It's all about styles really. But the best MMA guy should know how to take someone down so you'd think he'd always come out on top.

Boxing is SO dull. Punch, punch, hug, ref separate, punch, punch, hug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a fan of either sport but I have more respect for boxing. Boxing is a very dangerous sport and one need not look far to find casualties of the sport. No one trains like a boxer trains and I like the controlled environment in boxing. MMA is too random. A sport needs a strict set of guidelines on or it becomes utter chaos.

The problem with boxing is how the sport is ran. There is too much drama. Most of the boxers are complete morons and their stupidity is embraced by promoters. They need to discipline people for poor behavior. Also historically boxers refuse to fight the best opponents. Lennox Lewis never gave Klitschko a rematch. Had he not opened a cut on Klitschko's eye, he seemed to be headed to defeat in their first match. A rematch would've allowed Lewis to go out on top or to pass the torch. Instead he backed out like a coward.

Similarly the Klitschko brothers have dodged a lot of fights and the few who do fight them don't put up much of a fight. A lack of parity has severely hurt the heavyweight division and the Klitschko brothers won't fight each other. It is awkward to have the two best heavyweight fighters be brothers who won't fight each other. Especially when, as I said before, they both have a tendency to avoid and delay fights, although they have both stepped up and picked up more wins when they've had to.

Then there is the problem with how boxing matches are scored which we saw recently with Manny Pacquiao.

MMA is not a replacement for boxing, though. They're completely different sports. Fans of violence may like both, but any fan of the finer details of boxing won't be satisfied with MMA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
    • Fees nowadays are ridiculous. After purchasing concert tickets for my son’s 18th birthday and paying the rest of our HHI trip with 3 other families, I’m shocked at how much they are. Honestly, it’s grand theft. Some is taxes but in a world where everything is electronic, fees should be cheaper. Electrons don’t cost 10-30% of the event.
×
×
  • Create New...