Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you want Shockey back?


panther4life

  

166 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want Shockey back?

    • Yes
      136
    • No
      30


Recommended Posts

Only an idiot would say no...

He makes are team better, so obviously yes.

I don't necessarily think that someone rises to the level of "idiot" if they say no. It would be nice to have Shockey back, but perhaps it's time to move on and let one of the younger, more durable TEs develop. I am somewhat excited about the big guy (Bryant)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't necessarily think that someone rises to the level of "idiot" if they say no. It would be nice to have Shockey back, but perhaps it's time to move on and let one of the younger, more durable TEs develop. I am somewhat excited about the big guy (Bryant)

If a player makes you better and you can get them at the right price, then you can hold off on developing players. It's easier to go with the status quo than to start from scratch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a player makes you better and you can get them at the right price, then you can hold off on developing players. It's easier to go with the status quo than to start from scratch.

I get the overall message, but I assume that Barnidge will fill that role if Shockey doesn't want to (at our price), and promoting Barnidge is not exactly starting from scratch.

BTW, I voted "yes".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...