Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Feel bad for Tony Dungy


Zod

Recommended Posts

I don't see how Dungy is invested. His check didn't bounce. He got a Super Bowl somewhere else. He's good.

Dungy is a man that puts a lot into everything he does.

He definitely was responsible for changing the culture of the franchise in Tampa.

And it only took Gruden a few years to destroy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't feel bad for Dungy in regards to the Bucs not selling enough tickets because I don't care! I care about the Carolina Panthers: how many tickets we sell, how we play, how many games we win, etc. The only time I'm concerned about another team is when their record plays a part in my team making the Playoffs, or where we rank in the division, or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plainly put, when i think Tony Dungy, i think the Indianapolis Colts. Good things DO cover up bad things (when it comes to Football).

Edit: Unless your name is Joe Paterno, God rest his soul.

Honestly, i think its the order things happen. The whole Paterno thing happened last. Dungy was able to spend 6 years in Indy, and do great, so thats what we remember first. I think he couldnt care less IMO. He knows hes awesome, he has a great family, and hes set financially. He may even chuckle at the way things have turned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plainly put, when i think Tony Dungy, i think the Indianapolis Colts. Good things DO cover up bad things (when it comes to Football).

Edit: Unless your name is Joe Paterno, God rest his soul.

Honestly, i think its the order things happen. The whole Paterno thing happened last. Dungy was able to spend 6 years in Indy, and do great, so thats what we remember first. I think he couldnt care less IMO. He knows hes awesome, he has a great family, and hes set financially. He may even chuckle at the way things have turned.

what??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plainly put, when i think Tony Dungy, i think the Indianapolis Colts. Good things DO cover up bad things (when it comes to Football).

Edit: Unless your name is Joe Paterno, God rest his soul.

Honestly, i think its the order things happen. The whole Paterno thing happened last. Dungy was able to spend 6 years in Indy, and do great, so thats what we remember first. I think he couldnt care less IMO. He knows hes awesome, he has a great family, and hes set financially. He may even chuckle at the way things have turned.

Can you make it a little more plain? It's not plain enough for my brain :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plainly put, when i think Tony Dungy, i think the Indianapolis Colts. Good things DO cover up bad things (when it comes to Football).

Edit: Unless your name is Joe Paterno, God rest his soul.

Honestly, i think its the order things happen. The whole Paterno thing happened last. Dungy was able to spend 6 years in Indy, and do great, so thats what we remember first. I think he couldnt care less IMO. He knows hes awesome, he has a great family, and hes set financially. He may even chuckle at the way things have turned.

wat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...