Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Beas


Zod

Recommended Posts

It's obvious to anyone with a clue that his recent drop in play is 100% physical.

He is where he needs to be to make the plays but is still recovering and playing hurt.

Until he is back to playing shape he needs to wrap up. He can't rely in big hits as he just can't physically lay the hit like he used to.

I'm not giving up on him like many of you have. The only way he gets it fixed is on gamedays. Some players are not worth the risk, but Beas ain't one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's obvious to anyone with a clue that his recent drop in play is 100% physical.

He is where he needs to be to make the plays but is still recovering and playing hurt.

Until he is back to playing shape he needs to wrap up. He can't rely in big hits as he just can't physically lay the hit like he used to.

I'm not giving up on him like many of you have. The only way he gets it fixed is on gamedays. Some players are not worth the risk, but Beas ain't one of them.

Your premise does not support your conclusion. If his recent drop in play is 100% physical and he is playing hurt, playing him on gamedays is not the only way he gets fixed... getting healthy is the only way he gets fixed. And I have never heard a doctor prescribe "start at linebacker in the NFL" in the name of health.

Do you mean you think he is physically healthy, just out of shape?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think he can physiccally wrap up. He isnt relying on big hits. He is trying to tackle with one arm because his shoulder is clearly fuged. I love the guy too and by no means am i giving up on him, but right now he is hurting the team. He needs to sit down until hes healthy. Get well Beast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they pulled him to start the second half and Jason Phillips got sucked in on a screen and Michael Turner scored the touchdown. So they sent Beas back out there hurt.

So then why the hell can't we see a LB lineup of TD, Keek, Anderson?

Don't put Phillips out there unless someone is horribly gassed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they want to keep the rookie outside unless they think it's going to be a permanent change. I agree with the move at this point. I'm as big a Beason homer as there is, but it may be time to think about moving him outside and rotating with TD.

I just want the man healthy. We're not blowing the world away so if he needs to take a month off to heal then lets do it. I'm also high on Phillips, but he hasn't really played in a month, there's going to be a lull before he's up to speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...