Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No sense of urgency in Rivera's voice...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I really hate Ron Rivera as a head coach. How did he even have a good defense with the Bears or with San Diego? He can't motivate for ****!

He knows defense, but HC controls the whole team. Thats why he sucks

I wonder does McDermott know anything about offense? Atleast I know he fuging moves talks and motivates

Remember my recent Cam thread right. Yes, players reflect their coaches and they're fuging lost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tom Cat

Listening to him after the game, I really don't know if he knows his team is 1-4.

Might explain how this team plays with no sense of urgency.

When I listened to him on Panther talk after Atlanta he sounded like JR has given him as long as he needs - I said it then - he needs to be taken off his mega dose of wellbutin and brought back to reality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's becoming more and more apparent he isn't cut out for the job. The quesion remains though... As long as Richardson is the owner, does it matter?

Hurney is just as equally responsible for our failures as anyone, will he be shown the door? Will Richardson quit being a stubborn old fool and embrace the modern NFL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...