Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Three and outs on the first series of the game


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Is a regular occurence, and this is another problem I have with Chuds shitty playcalling. We gave gone three and out on the first offensive series all fuging year long. Get your head out of your ass idiot.

It's not just the first possession, it happens way too often throughout games.

Without looking, I'd say our amount of 3 and outs on drives after we have taken the lead are right up there with the amount of 3 and outs on the first possession.

And the amount of 3 and outs throughout game is why our offense has been so stagnant in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atlanta was the only game I remember where we scored on first possession. And our D kept them from scoring on theirs, something they'd done every game previous. Why does it usually take a series or two, and a score for the other team, to get poo going?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is a regular occurence, and this is another problem I have with Chuds shitty playcalling. We gave gone three and out on the first offensive series all fuging year long. Get your head out of your ass idiot.

I kept on saying this Sunday. I was like nice run for one on first down. Okay, way to go with the read option for negative two on second. It is like our OC is trying to engineer a third and long. I love seven step drops with our patch work o-line. Then Cam gets mashed on third or someone runs a route just short of the marker. Man, I think I am starting to get why people think its only Cam's fault. Its like its a huge poo sandwich and we're all gonna have to take a bite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...