Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which of these players should be cut if unwilling to restructure?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

http://www.spotrac.c...olina-panthers/

When I list the dead money, I am referring to the remaining signing bonuses that will hit the cap. You can take the hit all in 1 year or spread it over 2 if you desginate them a june 1st cut.I don't personally condone cutting all of these guys but heres our highest paid players and their scheduled cap hits and how much it would cost to cut them(dead money)

To understand the net cap hit of cutting each indvidual take their total cap hit - minus the dead money. You can spread it over 2 years(thanks rocknrolla) but whatever number you see listed in parentheses is the amount that would take an immediate hit next to the year listed. Then the remaining numbers in parentheses would come off in the 2nd year. Scroll down and see Rocknrolla's example of spreading CJ'S cap hit over 2 years for more clarification.

Here is the scheduled cap hits by year, numbers in parenthese are guaranteed amount for that year.

Charles Johnson

13: 13 million(6 million)

14: 15 million(6 million)

15: 16 million (6 million)

16: 11 million(0 of it guaranteed)

17: free agent

18 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Beason

13:9.5 million(4 million)

14: 10.750(4 million)

15:11.750(4 million)

16:9 million (0 of if guarnteed)

17:free agent

amount of dead money to be absorbed if cut;12 million(signing bonus)

Williams

13: 8.2 million(3.2)

14: 9.2 million(3.2)

15: 10.2 million(3.2)

16:free agent

amount to of dead money to be absorbed if cut; 9.6 million(signing bonus)

Jordan Gross

13:11.7 Million(1 million)

14:9.7(0 guarnteed)

15:free agent

1 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut.

Steve Smith

13:6.25 millon(2.5)

14:8 million(2.5)

15:11 million(2.5)

16:9 million(0 guaranteed)

17:free agent

6.5 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut.

Chris Gamble

13:7.9 million(2)

14:8.5 million(2)

15: free agent

4 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Jonathan Stewart

13:2.8 million(1.8)

14:5.55 million(1.8)

15:8.3 million(1.8)

16:9.05 million(1.8)

17:7.75 million(0 guaranteed)

18: free agent

7.2 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Charles Godfrey

13:3.7 million(1.1)

14:7.1 million(1.1)

15:7.1 million(1.1)

16:6.4 million(0 guarnteed)

17:free agent

3.3 million to be absorbed if cut

Thomas Davis:

13:4 million(1.66)

14:7 million(1.66)

15:11.56 million(1.66)

16: free agent

4.98 million to be absorbed if cut

Greg Olsen

13:6.35(500k)

14:7.825(500k)

15:7.825(500k)

16: free agent

1.5 million to be absorbed if cut

James Anderson

13:4.4(1.4)

14:4.4(1.4)

15:5.4(1.4)

16:free agent

4.2 million to be absorbed if cut

Ron Edwards

13:3.33(833k)

14:free agent

833k to be absorbed if cut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to correct you here, when you designate a June 1st cut it doesn't cut the cap hit in half for the two years, you take the normal cap hit for the first year and then the entire remainder the following year.

For example, if Charles Johnson was designated a June 1st cut the 2013 dead money cap hit would be $6 million, and the remainder ($12 million) would hit in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to correct you here, when you designate a June 1st cut it doesn't cut the cap hit in half for the two years, you take the normal cap hit for the first year and then the entire remainder the following year.

For example, if Charles Johnson was designated a June 1st cut the 2013 dead money cap hit would be $6 million, and the remainder ($12 million) would hit in 2014.

oh poo, thats not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why cut Ron? He is basically playing for vet minimum and we are getting solid production. Cutting him opens up another big hole at DT.

Unfortunately, I see Williams out the door for sure. I think everyone else stays. Beason, Gamble, and Gross are MUCH too valuable to let loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...