Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Black Ops 2 Panther Emblem


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

Some of you might remember, but I made a Panthers Black Ops emblem a few years ago found here:

Well the new Black Ops came out and I found out I had even more layers to work with. The following is my best attempt at the panther's logo. I kind of did a Hybrid between the old one and the new one, might not be perfect, but I like the way it came out:

319062_10100836287694773_1096618005_n.jpg

*UPDATED*

535424_10100837565159723_103613155_n.jpg

Just thought I'd share because everything else about the team just seems really depressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job man, I haven't messed around with the emblem much yet because I didn't check if all of it was unlocked yet, although it appeared to be.

Other than freezing occasionally, the game is absolutely awesome. Much more addictive and enjoyable than MW3, which was a huge disappointment. I never thought I'd end up favoring Treyarch over IW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job man, I haven't messed around with the emblem much yet because I didn't check if all of it was unlocked yet, although it appeared to be.

Other than freezing occasionally, the game is absolutely awesome. Much more addictive and enjoyable than MW3, which was a huge disappointment. I never thought I'd end up favoring Treyarch over IW.

Treyarch won me over with Black Ops 1. I hated World at War, so I was expecting BO to suck pretty hard but that blew me away. I ended up trading in MW2 and MW3 and went back to playing BO until BO2 came out.

Back to the topic at hand...DO WANT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's way better. They completely changed the whole perks/attachment system. You basically have 10 options to how you want to roll in the match. You could choose to have 6 perks at once, but you'd have to give up attachments like grenades or gun attachments. You can get some real cool combinations.

I think the biggest thing for me is the maps. If the maps suck, nothing else matters. The maps in BO2 are intuitive. There are your choke points where lots of close fights go down and spots for snipers throughout the maps. I feel like they modeled these maps closely after the original BO, which is a great idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking for a good multiplayer game for me and my brother to play. Can you play BO2 with separate bots, so we can play against each other without it being 1 vs 1, or do you have to play with random rubes on the internet as well?

Both Halo and BO2 have co-op options but havnt played them cause im an online junky. Ive bought both and have played both enough to say imo, Halo is the more entertaining of the two as far as multiplayer online. They did a great job revamping the sound and video quality of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...