Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Zod, Yes or No: Is Cam the Problem?


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

Since you seem to wade into threads to fuel the flames and then disappear, it's time to nut up and tell us what you actually know. You're supposed to be close to the organization, and despite your pleas of protecting sources you seem not to have an issue alluding to things, so don't pull that stunt. Straight up, is Cam a problem, and if he is, in what ways?

I'm also more than a little annoyed at how you seem to play both sides of the debate. Either back the kid, even when he's getting ripped, or don't. But don't humor the trolls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't you run a rival panthers board/blog? zod's going to give as little air time to your opinions as possible, especially when you are so brusque with them

It's not a rival, it was meant to be an aggregate news collection for Panthers-related stuff. I'm too busy with work to keep it updated.

And don't give me that brusque BS, Zod is a grown man, he can handle actually answering a question directly to the Huddle for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Padula1289

Why do you care what he thinks? I'll probably get banned for this but I don't care. Everything thinks Zod is the biggest and most knowledgable panther fan around. I disagree jut because his has a field pass and the capabilities to make this site doesn't mean anything. I can care what he thinks, he also think AE is a starter so go figure. I'm a bigger panther fan than he'll ever be,and his opinion means nothing to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...