Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Legit question. Mark Sanchez or Jimmy Clausen?


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

Mark Sanchez...really? You got to be kidding. What? You think Derek Anderson is going elsewhere?

As for the third string (which I don't think Sanchez wants to be), I would take my chances with Pickles. He has been here, has had a chance to learn, has developed some type of chemistry with the team (for what it's worth), and doesn't have the failed body of work that Sanchez has (which means that we can at least dream and/or be delusional about him getting the job done if need be).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark Sanchez...really? You got to be kidding. What? You think Derek Anderson is going elsewhere?

As for the third string (which I don't think Sanchez wants to be), I would take my chances with Pickles. He has been here, has had a chance to learn, has developed some type of chemistry with the team (for what it's worth), and doesn't have the failed body of work that Sanchez has (which means that we can at least dream and/or be delusional about him getting the job done if need be).

No, sir. It was more of IF you HAD to pick one. For fun sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fans view “box safety” with the same disdain they have when they hear “game manager” QB.   but there’s a reason most 1st round safeties are “box safeties”-it’s a much longer list of requisite skills to be a good box safety than it is to be a guy whose only real responsibility is to not get beat over the top. Fans crave the ed reed type and as someone who has never been able to enjoy this franchise having a guy like that, I get the enthusiasm-but I’m not really prepared to spend a first round pick on a free safety. If it happens it’ll be fun, it’ll address a need with a good player and that’s well and good. But those guys end up walking after their first contract because their pedigree usually outpaces what their teams feel like they’re adding to their overall win total.
    • Its criminal that the upcoming season is mainly in the tiny hands of BY.  I still member the time I did a full turn, if you member his first off-season from that Panthers all-time worst team....... Answering questions at his first presser, he goes along the lines " I didn't do nothing, no weight room or throwing" " I needed to get away". I was fully out with him, the guy didn't even try to improve his football mind, body, strength, in the biggest joke of panther football. I could not believe it, what a leader or dare say "point guard"(lols @ NBA point guards as a ref)
    • I view FS almost as the NT of the secondary. Oftentimes the true measure of his impact isn't necessarily in the plays that he makes but what he allows you to do with the rest of your defense to allow them to make plays. When you have that elite true sideline to sideline FS safety blanket over the top of the defense it allows you to be a lot more aggressive with everyone else. Where as when you have a Nick Scott as your last line of defense you gotta be mindful to not have to rely too heavily on that.
×
×
  • Create New...