Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you want as OC? (Poll)


Panthersfan704

Next Panthers OC  

140 members have voted

  1. 1. Your choice for Panthers OC



Recommended Posts

Really starting to like Jackson less and less. He done nothing in his career to show he's capable of developing a modern NFL offense. Is it possible he'll be able to? Sure, but with Whisenhunt on the board, he showed during his time in Zona that he is for with building a team that prides itself on the pass.

Turner is obviously the dream, but nothing to suggest we've made a move so far.

lol Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me be clear and say that I'm not really opposed to giving Jackson a shot, but what I like about Whisenhunt is just the success he's had having his offenses trend two different ways. It did, obviously, fall off in Arizona when he tried to orientate it more towards the run, but he'll have a QB and weapons here, and he won't be compelled to play "protect the QB from having to play QB" football.

My first priority is finding the guy who is going to further develop Cam into the elite QB-and then let him be that elite QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whizenhunt #1 due to more success as a HC. Took the Cardinals to the Super Bowl and steam rolled us in the process. Got a Lombardi as OC for the Steelers with Bill Cowher. Rivera needs serious help with game management and Whiz could be a good voice in his ear.

Jackson 2nd, Norv if he's still in play 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put Jackson as my 1a to Whiz's 1b based solely on experience. Ken was an OC for 2 seasons and went right into a HC job, much like Chud. I don't think he had enough time as an OC to fully develop a philosophy and get so in depth that it became second nature what works and what doesn't. Hue has seven years as an OC under his belt in all kinds of teams both NFL and college, as well as position coaching jobs for everything under the sun for the past 30 years almost.

I would be equally happy with either or Norv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
    • Seems to be the consensus from the talking heads. I really wish we had double dipped at center in the 2nd round. Sion will never play in the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...