Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is what it's come to in New York


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Telling the fans "Don't worry folks. We don't really need an accurate quarterback."

Asked in an interview on the Jets’ website if there’s a certain completion percentage benchmark that he’ll need his quarterback to reach, Mornhinweg answered, “No, absolutely not.”

Mornhinweg went on to say that he has seen quarterbacks have great seasons without great completion percentages.

“Some of the great ones have really not thrown for such great accuracy,” Mornhinweg said. “Steve Young was astronomical accuracy-wise. Brett Favre wasn’t. Brett Favre, I believe won an MVP two different times out of the three times that he won it, throwing 58, 59, 60 percent, somewhere in there. So they all come in different shapes and sizes.”

(link)

Does Mornhinweg have a valid point or is this just desperate spin to cover for Sanchez' ineptitude?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Telling the fans "Don't worry folks. We don't really need an accurate quarterback."

(link)

Does Mornhinweg have a valid point or is this just desperate spin to cover for Sanchez' ineptitude?

It makes some sense. Alex Smith had a higher completion pct than Tom Brady. Flacco, Stafford, and Eli didn't have stellar completion rates and nobody would consider them innefective. Newton's perecentage is pretty bad but I'm sure the Jets would poo themselves to have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something to consider...

If I recall correctly, the Jets are running a West Coast offense. The WCO actually inflates a quarterback's accuracy numbers because its bread and butter is short, high-percentage passes.

So if Sanchez were playing in a more conventional offense, it's no great stretch to think that his numbers might actually be lower than they are now.

(though to be fair, he does lead the league in buttfumbles)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's right in the sense that it's silly to have some arbitrary number to shoot for. Completion % is a function of offensive style as much as QB ability. I think he is definitely wording his answer in deflective way- the QBs on their roster have little in common with Brett Favre or any other elite QB with low percentages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something to consider...

If I recall correctly, the Jets are running a West Coast offense. The WCO actually inflates a quarterback's accuracy numbers because its bread and butter is short, high-percentage passes.

So if Sanchez were playing in a more conventional offense, it's no great stretch to think that his numbers might actually be lower than they are now.

(though to be fair, he does lead the league in buttfumbles)

They are moving to a WCO but neither Sparano or Schottenheimer were primarily WCO guys. Schottenheimer worked some of it in but Sparano not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are moving to a WCO but neither Sparano or Schottenheimer were primarily WCO guys. Schottenheimer worked some of it in but Sparano not so much.

I know Mornhinweg is thoroughly West Coast, pure Andy Reid disciple.

If you go by lineage, Schottenheimer should be a Coryell guy, but I haven't watched the Jets enough to say for certain.

(have watched enough to know Sanchez is not so great, though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Mornhinweg is thoroughly West Coast, pure Andy Reid disciple.

If you go by lineage, Schottenheimer should be a Coryell guy, but I haven't watched the Jets enough to say for certain.

(have watched enough to know Sanchez is not so great, though)

Therefore we will not know until they make the switch whether or not it inflates Sanchez's completion percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...