Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any realistic shot at Cordarrelle Patterson?


beastson52

Recommended Posts

So like title says, any realistic chance this guy is still available at 14th now that the Phins signed Wallace? I really really like this guys athleticism (someone that tall should NOT be able to cut and change direction like he does)!

I'm not really up-to-date with the position needs of any of the other team that pick before us. That is why I seek the Huddles plethora of knowledge on this and I'm tired of skimming through all the "sign (insert recently cut player) now"!!

So what do you guys think? plausable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buffalo is gonna take a Qb, Tennessee just used a first rounder on a receiver last year, no way the Jets take another raw receiver in the top 10 and they already have Hill and QB issues. Im thinkin he will be there now unless somebody trades up ahead of us. Even still im not sure we would take him either, wouldnt mind it tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not going to Miami bc they already have Wallace and Hartline.

But prob no. He may be heading to the Jets, Buffalo or Tennessee.

I think we're going DT at 14, leaving us to take a receiver in the 2nd (Hunter, Woods, Patton, "Roger", Twill, Hopkins). I'm happy with that

I just don't see us going DT in the first. That position has the second highest bust rate in all of football. Take a corner or receiver if its there if not take oline. All of these options play the numbers better than a DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...