Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dwan negotiation update: No movement


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Without Dwan, DT is the biggest need, with him I think DB is. We saw what we were like without the Edwards already and it wasn't pretty. I've been wanting a nice oline or DB, but the more I think about it a DT is really what this team needs bad. I'd hate to see Luke's talents used up trying to plug holes, watching the run - instead of covering who needs it. DT, Oline, DB/WR. (right thread!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason we aren't offering him more than 2 years IMO is that he is 32, had spine injury history and had one of his best years last year. Not a certainty he'll be as effective next year or in the 2nd year.

1 year deal is fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would increase the deal to 2.5 m, at most, if he doesn't bite just move on.

I would like to have Dwan back but there are other options still available in FA and history doesn't suggest that he'll put up the same numbers that he did in 2012 (never had more than 2.5 in a season up until last year).

If we're gonna bring in an over 30 rush DT on a 1-year deal, I'd almost prefer to go with Richard Seymour. He's a little older but has been much more productive throughout his career, including in Oakland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, no TV for tonight's game unless you have the NHL Network, I believe. I could be wrong, hopefully?
    • Early returns are great and exciting but also worth noting that Gettleman had a few drafts that looked incredible early on and wound up mostly sucking (2014 mainly). Also PFF; grain of salt, etc.    I'm completely sold on Tet being a stud, knocked a high pick out of the park like we needed to and always should. Nearly sold on Scourton. Not sold on Princely but he had flashes. Not sold on Etienne as more than a 3rd stringer and special teamer, but that's not terrible for his draft position. Big fan of Ransom and think he'll be a starter.  Cam Jackson : IDK, I see limited upside but we didn't see much of him Evans was a nice find for draft position and he had a great rookie year for a late round rookie TE with plenty of veteran competition. Not sure about his upside though, seems like best case is a long term #2/3 TE, which isn't bad. Jimmy Horn, personally I didn't see a damn thing from him that impressed me all year. And he got a lot of opportunities. Pulling for the kid, but not convinced he's an NFLer.   UDFA: Fitzgerald was an amazing find
    • Hoping someone tells us Bussi was in the starter's crease for the morning skate. Otherwise, place your 1st shot- 1st goal bets! Any closer to a deal that could land a 2C in Trocheck or Brayden Schenn? Or land a winger in Alex Tuch or reach for Jordan Kyrou?
×
×
  • Create New...