Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

would you take a shot on a player who has never played football 7th round?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Absolutely. 7th round picks are throwaways anyway. Better to spend a 7th and secure the rights to a guy than have to try to win him over via FA. If a guy is a freak athlete and you don't have any qualms about him other than inexperience, I'd definitely take a shot in the 7th, or even the 6th if there's not another more pressing need available (for example, Kicker).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Athleticism you can't teach... unfortunately, you can't really teach football field smarts to a guy who has spent 22 years never knowing what it feels like to be on the field. You can be as fast as you want to be, but if you don't know where to run then you're worthless. It's the same reason that Usain Bolt wouldn't work as an NFL player. It takes more than physical gifts to make it work. He'll be coming to a league where he's only a few tenths of a second faster than guys who have been playing the game their whole life. It just makes no sense to invest a draft pick into a guy like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...