Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: 49ers looking to trade up to 13 or 14...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

Point blank, if Star or Lane falls to 14th, the last team I want to get stronger is the defending NFC champ. Why don't we do follow what the 49ers have done for years and stay put and draft on a BPA philosophy?

They don't necessarily stay put, though. They were the beneficiaries of the Everette Brown disaster. They got Iupati out of that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would swap 14 for 31 and 34 without thinking twice. This draft isn't top heavy. We get 3 guaranteed starters if we make that trade.

totally agreed.

in fact i just saw a mock from some bills beat reporter in which we made that trade.

we came out with terron armstead (OT), coradelle patterson, and jesse williams with our first three picks....just to give an idea of what kind of thing is possible at that point.

i don't know about you guys, but that ain't exactly three dimes right there.

improve the OL, improve the WR corps, and improve the DL, esp. against the run?....yeah, i'll take that.

oh...link to that mock: http://www.wgr550.com/NFL-Mock-Draft--6/16111938

and why would the 49ers do that? because they don't have the money for 2 first rounders...that's why. they don't have the cap space or really the roster space for all the picks they have coming their way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

totally agreed.

in fact i just saw a mock from some bills beat reporter in which we made that trade.

we came out with terron armstead (OT), coradelle patterson, and jesse williams with our first three picks....just to give an idea of what kind of thing is possible at that point.

i don't know about you guys, but that ain't exactly three dimes right there.

improve the OL, improve the WR corps, and improve the DL, esp. against the run?....yeah, i'll take that.

oh...link to that mock: http://www.wgr550.co...aft--6/16111938

and why would the 49ers do that? because they don't have the money for 2 first rounders...that's why. they don't have the cap space or really the roster space for all the picks they have coming their way.

Give me a Safety/Corner in the fourth and wake me up from this dream....

Shamarko Thomas/Sean Williams/Josh Evans

Jordan Poyer/Sanders Commings/Brandon McGee

Might even be able to go Safety in fourth and McGee in fifth....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

totally agreed.

in fact i just saw a mock from some bills beat reporter in which we made that trade.

we came out with terron armstead (OT), coradelle patterson, and jesse williams with our first three picks....just to give an idea of what kind of thing is possible at that point.

i don't know about you guys, but that ain't exactly three dimes right there.

improve the OL, improve the WR corps, and improve the DL, esp. against the run?....yeah, i'll take that.

oh...link to that mock: http://www.wgr550.co...aft--6/16111938

and why would the 49ers do that? because they don't have the money for 2 first rounders...that's why. they don't have the cap space or really the roster space for all the picks they have coming their way.

That would be straight up robbery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me a Safety/Corner in the fourth and wake me up from this dream....

Shamarko Thomas/Sean Williams/Josh Evans

Jordan Poyer/Sanders Commings/Brandon McGee

Might even be able to go Safety in fourth and McGee in fifth....

and it's entirely feasible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

totally agreed.

in fact i just saw a mock from some bills beat reporter in which we made that trade.

we came out with terron armstead (OT), coradelle patterson, and jesse williams with our first three picks....just to give an idea of what kind of thing is possible at that point.

i don't know about you guys, but that ain't exactly three dimes right there.

improve the OL, improve the WR corps, and improve the DL, esp. against the run?....yeah, i'll take that.

oh...link to that mock: http://www.wgr550.co...aft--6/16111938

and why would the 49ers do that? because they don't have the money for 2 first rounders...that's why. they don't have the cap space or really the roster space for all the picks they have coming their way.

I said this yesterday. We could fill three big holes rather than two. I know this is a stretch but think about when you come up to a parking meter...what good is a dollar when all you need is three dimes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this yesterday. We could fill three big holes rather than two. I know this is a stretch but think about when you come up to a parking meter...what good is a dollar when all you need is three dimes?

The problem with this analogy is unless the unthinkable happens and Star or Lane Johnson fall (it isn't happening) the prospects at 14 aren't dollars....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be straight up robbery.

i'd consider it a win/win....much in the same way it was for the bucs/jets.

the thing that gets me most giddy about that possible scenario isn't the exact players mentioned...it's gettleman making the call who those players are going to be.

we could come out of this draft with 3 legit starters from the first couple rounds. i'll take 3 legit starters over revis any day. esp. with that cap hit. we'd get all three players for what revis would be getting in one year...and i'm talking about their entire rookie contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with this analogy is unless the unthinkable happens and Star or Lane Johnson fall (it isn't happening) the prospects at 14 aren't dollars....

Yeah. But they may have someone highly rated on their board that we don't know about. It happens every year, some teams just like certain guys that no one else seems to. I have no clue who we feel that way about. It will be interesting to find out in a few days. My point is that Gettlemen may think they can get a dollar at 14. I'd still rather have three dimes this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...