Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

woodson willing to play for anyone.

nosuchthingasapanther

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

No thanks. We are talking about s guy who won the heisman in 98'.

We are talking about renting him...

We are talking about a guy who has been an All Pro every year recently until injury kept from a full season

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigdog10 Experienced

bigdog10

Posted
Posted

In my opinion this signing makes a ton of sense.

 

I think he could still play corner with our front four pressure, however his value would be in his leadership and ability to teach our young guys in the secondary.

 

Over-paying for veterans doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but most playoff and championship teams are built around a core nucleus of young players and a couple of role filling vets.  Woodson would be a huge asset to this team if we could afford him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mvp2014 Collaborator

Mvp2014

Posted
Posted

We are talking about renting him...

We are talking about a guy who has been an All Pro every year recently until injury kept from a full season

Nope. I think his good days are gone. Cant cover anymore. I wouldnt even trust him covering TEs from the FS spot. Losing two tenths on your 40 kills any db. But yes, three years ago he was a monster
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbully Contributor

cbully

Posted
Posted

He's a decent player but not great against the run. If he has to make a ton of tackles he will break down by week 6.

maybe you need to look at what we've dealing with over the last few year at safety. experience is what we need right now. we would be and immediately impact and upgrade which could upgrade our other db performances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      panthers offense 30 of 32 in yards per play

      By strato · Posted

      I hope you understand that this Anti Bryce thing as you call it is really a pro Panthers thing. I think I can safely use we. We want the best for the Panthers.  As far as this other post saying ‘Anti’ Bryce people do misinformation.. you mean like going all in on “Renfro should have caught” that poorly thrown ball? I guess it was week 1. And calling it a drop. Comical btw.  I wonder, did you call that out or let it slide because it aligned with your agenda? 
    • strato
      Not to early to talk 2026 Hall of Fame nominees

      By strato · Posted

      These are great posts with the comparisons and the numbers.   I haven’t lookyat Smity’s numbers since probably the first time he was on the ballot.  But if you watched every week you know what he is. Whatever his yardage or targets numbers were.  He was fuging dominant. I have watched since the AFL days and seen who there is to see. There are many great WRs over the years. GREAT WRs. Smitty is up there in the game of football. 
    • OneBadCat
      Not to early to talk 2026 Hall of Fame nominees

      By OneBadCat · Posted

      Smith is clear cut HOF if you judge what he did by reception. Fitzgerald was a stat padder.    The most Steve Smith was ever targeted in his career was in 2005 (150 targets). The same year he wins the triple crown.    Larry Fitzgerald was targeted more than 150 times over 9 separate seasons. Not once eclipsing 1500 yards in a season.    The over glazing of Larry Fitzgerald going around is way over blown. ARZ was top 10 in passing attempts nearly his entire prime. Steve Smith and Andre Johnson had it far worse and would have surpassed his #s in the same situation.
×
×
  • Create New...