Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL teams going to college ranks to learn how to stop the pistol and zone read


SCP

Recommended Posts

With teams like Atlanta going to Alabama to learn how to stop these hybrid college/pro offensive schemes, will we see offenses begin to shift back to ground-and-pound? Or is the Chip Kelly style of offense here to stay? Should be an interesting couple of years to watch the chess match as teams begin to figure out how to stop the new offenses. That's why I like Gettleman's approach. Schemes can be adjusted to and beaten. But if you have big, strong men on the interior and can physically dominate the line of scrimmage 4-5 yards at a time on offense and hold the point of attack on defense then you can withstand the trends that come and go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spread offense isn't going anywhere. It's not a fad, or a trend, or some cool hipster thing. It's becoming the base offense in today's NFL because it enables you to get as many pass catchers on the field as possible with as much space as possible in a league that is going to continue to becoming more and more pass friendly.

The zone read may recede some, the pistol as well. But to equate the spread with certain plays run out of it is like saying a 38 pitch will be done away with as the I-Form becomes less and less popular.

Heavy run teams will never ever again be a staple of the NFL barring some catastrophic psyche change by the American people where all of a sudden passing the ball and QBs aren't interesting and running up the middle for four yards is.

The further the league trends this way is where the real fun of this chess match comes in. You'll see evolutions of the spread and defense designed to counter it, and in turn more evolutions, leading to things we've never seen in the sport before.

But the days of through the dirt teams are dead and will soon be nothing but a memory held by those of us who are here now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to know if the spread, read, etc. is going away.....go watch middle school, high school, and look who the colleges are recruiting.

 

It isn't a fad.  It will only go away once the Cam Newton's, RGIII's etc get converted to other positions coming out of high school and early college.  Which ain' t gonna happen any time soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we will begin to see a new type of base defense evolve? In 5 years what will a front 7 look like from an athletic standpoint?

I would say maybe smaller athletic LBs in a 4-3 or Nickel becoming a base defense. Maybe some 3-3-5 looks too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we will begin to see a new type of base defense evolve? In 5 years what will a front 7 look like from an athletic standpoint?

This is an interesting question, but I doubt 5 years is long enough for any significant change.

It is interesting to try and imagine what might happen though. Will we see entirely new base sets? Will see large "space eater" DTs fade away as team emphasize getting more pass rushers on the field?

I suppose it's interesting to imagine that as athleticism increases, we may see DLs shrink initially (giving a small window for a temporary but very limited, running game rebirth, but certainly not to the level they once were) with teams attempting to get as many pass rushers on the field as possible, before athleticism catches back up and you see guys who are 6-6 310 or more of pure muscle. I wonder if the days if the fat boy are dying, as the days of the slow but tough, grizzly white dude have.

You're going to see more and more Cam type freaks come in at every position until its the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a big, athletic body in the middle like a Ngata is necessary to keep those middle run lanes clogged. With the spread stretching everything out you need integrity in the middle. Collapsing the pocket in the middle should stand the test of time. What surrounds that hog body though is where we will see things change IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kuechly is the model of the future middle linebacker position against the pistol and zone read. He's almost like a hybrid type of player. Smaller in stature and quicker.

Kuechley and a guy like Mingo out of LSU. Tall, athletic as hell, muscular. Can rush and clog passing lanes. Seeing four guys like that spread out behind a fast, athletic d-line would be scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kuechley and a guy like Mingo out of LSU. Tall, athletic as hell, muscular. Can rush and clog passing lanes. Seeing four guys like that spread out behind a fast, athletic d-line would be scary.

 

Exactly. Ive thought about this a lot.  In 10-20 years the kids that are gonna be playing in the NFL are gonna be crazy athletic. This is inevitable with more focus on the NFL and its rewards, better nutrition, and learning playbooks at an earlier age.  What we are gonna see in 10 to 20 years is gonna be fuging crazy.  I think guys like Kuechly and Cam, as well as others are just the start of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The teams that have had the most success stopping Oregon have been Auburn, LSU, Cal and Stanford. All of them had NFL talent in the front 7. I think we're building our D the right way. Guess we'll see in week 1!

Stanford is the intriguing one out of that list because I generally don't think of Stanford as being this overly athletic team. They seem ti be more old school football. They run a base 4-3 at Stanford?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stanford is the intriguing one out of that list because I generally don't think of Stanford as being this overly athletic team. They seem ti be more old school football. They run a base 4-3 at Stanford?

Yes they run a 4-3. The key is disruption and penetration in the back field forcing quick reads. Standard did it mostly with their linebackers. Auburn of course had Fairly. Too bad the Ducks didn't play Utah the last couple years. Would have been fun to see Star go up against them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...