Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Butt Ass Ugly Abercrombie and Fitch CEO Discriminates Against Fat and Ugly People; Guy Decides to Pwnt and Troll Him... WINNING ENSUES


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

 

"A&F CEO and Old Biff look alike..."  LOL.

 

For a little more background:

 


In response to Abercrombie & Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries not wanting "not so cool" kids or women who wear size large to wear his company's clothes, Greg Karber has come up with a funny and creative way to readjust the Abercrombie & Fitch brand.

He's giving their clothes to the homeless.

After scouring his local thrift shop's "douchebag section," Karber heads to LA's Skid Row to dole out the clothes among the homeless population. Watch the stunt and find out how you can be involved in one man's troll-job on a company with some pretty unflattering business practices in the video above.

 

I, personally, have always hated A&F and the image they have projected.  I hope the CEOs words end up ruining them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never bought an Abercrombie shirt or any apparel. As he said, it's the douchebag section. That said i don't see a problem with a company doing what it wants with their own poo.

 

Me either, but to come out and say they don't make larger sizes of their products simply because they don't want fat, unattractive, unpopular people to wear them seems counterintuitive.  It's disrespectful, AND it doesn't make sense because they're shorting themselves on profits through discriminatory practices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abercrombie & Fitch clothing should not be worn by any male after the age of 21. The same with cargo shorts. I wore this stuff in high school and my first two years of college but grown ups don't wear (or pay for) blue jeans with holes in them. 

 

If you guys want to really hear about about a POS owner(s), do some research on Jimmy John Liautaud and "Papa" John Schnatter.  Or ask anyone who used to work for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most high-end fashion brands have the same thought process.  He just came out and said it.

 

IDK there are stories on the net about this guy that set him apart, which may or may not be true but the amount of them makes me think it's true.   Apparently if he vists your store, you have to go in the backroom and can't look at him, he doesn't like that.  The front positions where people work, salespeople I guess, etc, are called "models" and yes, they have to look the part or they won't be hired.  It's not descrimination because the company caters to THAT type of person, apparently, really odd how that works.  The dude is very OCD and has some issues, trying to make himself look like a teenager through lots of plastic surgery and whatnot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abercrombie & Fitch clothing should not be worn by any male after the age of 21. The same with cargo shorts. I wore this stuff in high school and my first two years of college but grown ups don't wear (or pay for) blue jeans with holes in them. 

 

If you guys want to really hear about about a POS owner(s), do some research on Jimmy John Liautaud and "Papa" John Schnatter.  Or ask anyone who used to work for them. 

 

What kind of shorts do you wear?  The short kind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abercrombie & Fitch clothing should not be worn by any male after the age of 21. The same with cargo shorts. I wore this stuff in high school and my first two years of college but grown ups don't wear (or pay for) blue jeans with holes in them.

If you guys want to really hear about about a POS owner(s), do some research on Jimmy John Liautaud and "Papa" John Schnatter. Or ask anyone who used to work for them.

Sorry bro, I'm still part of the cargo short mafia. I rock them shitz to my sons soccer game and keep snacks in the cargo pockets. Boss bitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...