Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Butt Ass Ugly Abercrombie and Fitch CEO Discriminates Against Fat and Ugly People; Guy Decides to Pwnt and Troll Him... WINNING ENSUES


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

 

"A&F CEO and Old Biff look alike..."  LOL.

 

For a little more background:

 


In response to Abercrombie & Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries not wanting "not so cool" kids or women who wear size large to wear his company's clothes, Greg Karber has come up with a funny and creative way to readjust the Abercrombie & Fitch brand.

He's giving their clothes to the homeless.

After scouring his local thrift shop's "douchebag section," Karber heads to LA's Skid Row to dole out the clothes among the homeless population. Watch the stunt and find out how you can be involved in one man's troll-job on a company with some pretty unflattering business practices in the video above.

 

I, personally, have always hated A&F and the image they have projected.  I hope the CEOs words end up ruining them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never bought an Abercrombie shirt or any apparel. As he said, it's the douchebag section. That said i don't see a problem with a company doing what it wants with their own poo.

 

Me either, but to come out and say they don't make larger sizes of their products simply because they don't want fat, unattractive, unpopular people to wear them seems counterintuitive.  It's disrespectful, AND it doesn't make sense because they're shorting themselves on profits through discriminatory practices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abercrombie & Fitch clothing should not be worn by any male after the age of 21. The same with cargo shorts. I wore this stuff in high school and my first two years of college but grown ups don't wear (or pay for) blue jeans with holes in them. 

 

If you guys want to really hear about about a POS owner(s), do some research on Jimmy John Liautaud and "Papa" John Schnatter.  Or ask anyone who used to work for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most high-end fashion brands have the same thought process.  He just came out and said it.

 

IDK there are stories on the net about this guy that set him apart, which may or may not be true but the amount of them makes me think it's true.   Apparently if he vists your store, you have to go in the backroom and can't look at him, he doesn't like that.  The front positions where people work, salespeople I guess, etc, are called "models" and yes, they have to look the part or they won't be hired.  It's not descrimination because the company caters to THAT type of person, apparently, really odd how that works.  The dude is very OCD and has some issues, trying to make himself look like a teenager through lots of plastic surgery and whatnot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abercrombie & Fitch clothing should not be worn by any male after the age of 21. The same with cargo shorts. I wore this stuff in high school and my first two years of college but grown ups don't wear (or pay for) blue jeans with holes in them. 

 

If you guys want to really hear about about a POS owner(s), do some research on Jimmy John Liautaud and "Papa" John Schnatter.  Or ask anyone who used to work for them. 

 

What kind of shorts do you wear?  The short kind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abercrombie & Fitch clothing should not be worn by any male after the age of 21. The same with cargo shorts. I wore this stuff in high school and my first two years of college but grown ups don't wear (or pay for) blue jeans with holes in them.

If you guys want to really hear about about a POS owner(s), do some research on Jimmy John Liautaud and "Papa" John Schnatter. Or ask anyone who used to work for them.

Sorry bro, I'm still part of the cargo short mafia. I rock them shitz to my sons soccer game and keep snacks in the cargo pockets. Boss bitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope, that’s not the disconnect. In 2022, our GM knew he was going QB in the 2023 draft. You are talking about risking fans involvement on a team that’s been basically bottom 3 in the NFL from 2018 to now. There is no risk when you are that bad. We were right to want Fitterer to tank in 2022 and get rid of anyone who could bring us big value and extra cap room for future years when we aren’t winning 2-7 wins a year. We knew we wanted a rookie QB so we didn’t trade assets for picks and get a better draft slot so we ended up only getting a 2nd for Burns and threw in DJ Moore plus an early 2nd instead of a 1st, which basically lost us an early 2nd. The “risk” to our franchise’s losing culture ended up being around 4 1sts of total value. Yep, I refuse to listen to the other perspective that lost us around 4 1sts of value. At least our fan involvement is so high that our stadium isn’t chock full of visiting fans since we’ve won so much since 2022. Again, you won’t change my mind that we should have tanked in 2022 and had another 2-4 Browns/Horns on this team.
    • 2006 rematch if Canes and Oilers advance
    • It was the Colts that pulled theirs. Colts did Minecraft video without getting Microsoft’s permission (Chargers did get their permission). The questionable content was having the coast guard stop tyreek hill.
×
×
  • Create New...