Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Lone Ranger


SZ James (banned)

Recommended Posts

so you only like movies that are rated favorably?

spoon fed?

Nope. Just know a crap movie when I see one. I'll sometimes check rotten tomatoes after watching a crap movie and yep, they agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rotten Tomatoes is hardly the end all be all for movie ratings. A lot of times critics there will pan a movie while viewers give it good ratings. It's all about individual preference. I don't go into every movie expecting oscar noms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not a "for dumb people" movie. The main criticism is reviewers saying its too long. Sorry but that doesn't warrant such a poo score at these aggregate websites and it shouldn't stop anyone that wanted to go see it from seeing it. I almost backed out at the last minute but I'm glad I didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped using RT after they gave this poo 78%

 

Honestly the idea of breaking down a movie and giving it a score never really made sense to me.  Its all about the context you watch it and what you're expectations are going into it.  You're going to have a different experience watching a comedy with your parents than with your friends, and thats okay.  I can enjoy watching a movie like Fast 6 cause I'm not worried about the plot holes and realism, because thats not what I want from that movie.  Hell, the 5th and 6th movies were better IMO than the earlier ones because everyone making it just accepted that nobody really cared about that stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46683459/2025-nfl-offseason-tiers-32-teams-best-worst-signings-trades-draft-barnwell Slightly above expectations Highlights: Trading WR Adam Thielen, signing RB Rico Dowdle (one year, $2.8 million), drafting fifth-round TE Mitchell Evans   Disappointments: Re-signing CB Mike Jackson (two years, $10.5 million)   The Panthers chose the right time to move on from Thielen, who had been productive in Carolina before being dealt to Minnesota just before the season. He has been lost in the shuffle there. While the Panthers won't see the fourth-round pick that forms the bulk of the return for Thielen until 2027, getting out from what was owed to a player who has 47 receiving yards in Minnesota is an easy victory. Dowdle has been a revelation since moving into the starting lineup after Chuba Hubbard's injury, becoming one of a handful of players in NFL history to produce consecutive 200-yard scrimmage games. The former Cowboys back was averaging 3 yards per carry before the opportunity, so I'm not sure I would count on him playing like Jim Brown the rest of the way in a rotational role alongside Hubbard. But it's hard to argue that Carolina hasn't already gotten its $2.8 million worth out of the 27-year-old back. Most of Carolina's biggest moves are either tracking to be right around expectation (drafting wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan) or have been impacted by unexpected injuries (signing defensive tackle Tershawn Wharton). Jackson was a pleasant surprise as a starter in 2024, and he hasn't been terrible this season, but most of the big plays against Carolina have come on throws against the former Seahawks cornerback. Overall, though, this has been a very reasonable offseason for the Panthers
    • How would you have taken the guy who was picked ahead of us? That makes no sense.
    • I am not denying that things were said. That wasn’t my point. But carry on this will go nowhere.    Oh snap, the post calling him a liar was like three posts before you jumped in.  what do you get, a post a page? 
×
×
  • Create New...