Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Lone Ranger


SZ James (banned)

Recommended Posts

so you only like movies that are rated favorably?

spoon fed?

Nope. Just know a crap movie when I see one. I'll sometimes check rotten tomatoes after watching a crap movie and yep, they agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rotten Tomatoes is hardly the end all be all for movie ratings. A lot of times critics there will pan a movie while viewers give it good ratings. It's all about individual preference. I don't go into every movie expecting oscar noms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not a "for dumb people" movie. The main criticism is reviewers saying its too long. Sorry but that doesn't warrant such a poo score at these aggregate websites and it shouldn't stop anyone that wanted to go see it from seeing it. I almost backed out at the last minute but I'm glad I didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped using RT after they gave this poo 78%

 

Honestly the idea of breaking down a movie and giving it a score never really made sense to me.  Its all about the context you watch it and what you're expectations are going into it.  You're going to have a different experience watching a comedy with your parents than with your friends, and thats okay.  I can enjoy watching a movie like Fast 6 cause I'm not worried about the plot holes and realism, because thats not what I want from that movie.  Hell, the 5th and 6th movies were better IMO than the earlier ones because everyone making it just accepted that nobody really cared about that stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...