Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

B. Moore may be off the market soon...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

Per Ian Rapoport :

 

NFL.com's Ian Rapoport reports the Cowboys are "in talks" with free agent OG Brandon Moore.

Both of the Cowboys' starting guards are on the shelf, and Moore is far-and-away the best remaining interior lineman, so a deal would make a lot of sense. The Cowboys are also reportedly considering free agent OG Brian Waters. Someone should be signed by Wednesday.

 

 

It looks like Moore wont be coming to the rescue before the season starts.  Not that I had my hopes up but at least we can cross his name off the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we've got garry. why in the world would we need moore?

The problem is if Moore wants a multi-year deal and the Panthers obliged, that would make it impossible to re-sign Hardy. There is no way Moore (who I believe graded out as the fourth best right guard) would come cheap.

At the end of the day, I'd rather have the Kraken.

But I get your point, the right guard position is just brutally bad and it needs to be addressed with someone better than the likes of Chris Scott.

I think they might just be waiting for Wharton to except a vet minimum contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to think Gettleman is wanting to stick with what we have and have Kugbilla take over eventually during the season. To be honest he can see these guys everyday and I guess he sees enough potential in Kugbilla to not bring in a moderate money free agent to protect the right side. I just hope Cam doesn't end up paying for this high risk game Gettleman is playing with Kugbilla.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to think Gettleman is wanting to stick with what we have and have Kugbilla take over eventually during the season. To be honest he can see these guys everyday and I guess he sees enough potential in Kugbilla to not bring in a moderate money free agent to protect the right side. I just hope Cam doesn't end up paying for this high risk game Gettleman is playing with Kugbilla.

It can't be for kugbilla. He hasn't even practiced yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna be so pissed if the offensive line is struggling and Gettle doesn't do anything about it. As if he's setting Cam up for failure.

You have just created a paradox. How does one set someone up for failure that cannot fail?

Eg: what happens when an immoveable object meets an unstoppable force?

Answer: Yes We Cam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can't be for kugbilla. He hasn't even practiced yet.

 

That's what scares me. Either he sees potential in Kugbilla who, while promising, has hardly practiced or honestly thinks Garry Williams is an NFL caliber starting RG. It wouldn't surprise me if we scrape someone off waivers once teams make cuts, but it seems management really likes Kugbilla even though he's hardly practiced. That's the vibe I'm getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what scares me. Either he sees potential in Kugbilla who, while promising, has hardly practiced or honestly thinks Garry Williams is an NFL caliber starting RG. It wouldn't surprise me if we scrape someone off waivers once teams make cuts, but it seems management really likes Kugbilla even though he's hardly practiced. That's the vibe I'm getting.

I guess we'll know for sure in a few weeks...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...