Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Bears at Panthers Predictions Thread

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

redbuddha Newbie

redbuddha

Posted
Posted

Ok I've already predicted trick play on kickoff with ginn and Barner, as we line up for extra point G. Williams comes in as te, and helps convert 2 pt conversion.

Score 8-0, 15 seconds elapsed in game. Rivera changes facial expression to yeah it's gonna be different this year face. Huddle website breaks down, I get no more updates till next day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

Either CJ or Hardy gets a sack in the first series.

Kuechly is in on every tackle while in the game.

Davis puts a big hit on somebody.

Cam throws a couple high prompting footwork and accuracy concerns.

Smitty catches 1 pass.

Barner looks like a beast.

Olsen catches 3 passes.

Oline looks pedestrian.

We win by a couple scores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Achilles Newbie

Achilles

Posted
Posted

I'd like to see a good solid drive from our starting offense. I feel like the coaches should be focused on putting together a quality TD drive on that first possession.  Maybe make a little game plan just for the first quarter.   If we get 2 possessions in the 1st quarter, I'd like to see 10+ points on the board.  Much more important than points, though, is quality of play.  

 

I agree about the importance of the 1st half score.  A lead at halftime would be encouraging.  Otherwise a win is not important.

 

I predict we win this one (24-20), but the Bears make it close in the 4th quarter.

 

I also predict Armanti will be the leading Panther receiver for this game, but Olsen will get the only rec. TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...