Game on the line... you going with Beason, Morgan or Keuchly....

[charlottenian]

and why? everything being equal and all are healthy.... 

 

My nod is to Morgan, I think he was just as good of a tackler as Keuchly but better in the passing coverage

[bleys]

Kuechly..  he is more likely to play throughout the whole game.

[gmonjimbo]

Depends on the situation. If it is  3rd and long, I would go with Beason because he is better than Kuechly and Morgan in pass coverage. However, if it was  3rd and short, I would choose Kuechly because he has good instincts and might stuff the run before it develops.

[bleys]

a fine Mr Scot appreciation thread... 

 

 

 

 

where there is no right answer, yet will generate a ton of hypothetical discussion. 

[Kuech the Sneak]

Depends on the situation. If it is 3rd and long, I would go with Beason because he is better than Kuechly and Morgan in pass coverage. However, if it was 3rd and short, I would choose Kuechly because he has good instincts and might stuff the run before it develops.

What he said, I feel more inclined to go with kuechly though just based on how great a tackler he is

[Wundrbread33]

Morgan, unless the situation is Michael Vick diving toward the endzone from the 5 yard line... 

[Cary Kollins]

If they were all going into their second year? Keek all day.

[CRA]

and why? everything being equal and all are healthy....

My nod is to Morgan, I think he was just as good of a tackler as Keuchly but better in the passing coverage

well, who would I take if they all only had 1 year under their belt? Luke. IMO, Luke is the best after one year.

Who would I pick....if going off the best we have seen. Morgan. If I had him at his best and knew he would be healthy for a game.

[Herbert The Love Bug]

I dont understand the point of this but kuechly all day then morgan and beason in a distant 3rd

[BigBoss]

Dan Morgan. Such a shame the guy couldn't stay healthy.

[iamhubby1]

IMO, too many have forgotten just what type of player Morgan was. He was a tackling machine for the same reasons Keek is. Instincts and knowledge. They are both students of the game. As is Beast.

I would go with Morgan for the simple reason he could do it all. Keek is not quite there yet, but could eventually be the best of the bunch. Beast would not be a bad choice either. Hellz, anyone one of them will make the play.

For a franchise as young as ours. It really is amazing how many great MLBs we have had. There really is no wrong answer to this question.

[bleys]

I dont understand the point of this but kuechly all day then morgan and beason in a distant 3rd

 

I just explained this at #4....   there is no point.

[Rules&Regulations]

Give me TD in his prime that year he tore his ACL for the first time. Dude was a beast. Great in pass coverage, blowing up plays in the backfield, and lays the wood in goal line situations.

[Anybodyhome]

Luke.

 

Dan Morgan played in less than 50% of the games he was on the roster, so the odds of him being on the field are not very good.

Jon Beason was only fractionally better in pass coverage than Luke, but Luke is faster than Beason right now