Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Percentage or Yardage


Recommended Posts

It has been well documented that we gave up the highest percentage of completions last year but what got me was we were still pretty good against the pass as far a yardage was concerned.

 

So, a guy catches a quick slant and gets wrapped up immediately IMO is better than giving up longer completions but few catches.

 

I just think the Percentage issue is more of a stat thing then a quality defense thing?

 

Comments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it depends on how many of these slants and quick completions these guys are making.

If we allow only 2 long passes a game I'd take that over 15 quick slants that allow them to drive on us all day and pick up first down Amsterdam first down

 

I hear you.

 

I guess my point is.  You give up two or three big plays verses 2 and 3 yard slants.  Give up three 3yd slants it is 4th and 1. 

 

We averaged 240.9 yds per game.  10.4 per reception which was second only to SF 10.3.  Over all I think the percentage is more of a stat thing then something you can guage how good a defense is.

 

Stats from NFL.com

 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&season=2012&seasonType=REG&role=OPP&d-447263-n=1&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-p=1&statisticCategory=TEAM_RECEIVING&conference=ALL&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_AVERAGE_YARDS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear you.

I guess my point is. You give up two or three big plays verses 2 and 3 yard slants. Give up three 3yd slants it is 4th and 1.

We averaged 240.9 yds per game. 10.4 per reception which was second only to SF 10.3. Over all I think the percentage is more of a stat thing then something you can guage how good a defense is.

Stats from NFL.com

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&season=2012&seasonType=REG&role=OPP&d-447263-n=1&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-p=1&statisticCategory=TEAM_RECEIVING&conference=ALL&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_AVERAGE_YARDS

I dont think you're taking into account how dreadful we were against the run. Teams had no need to throw deep that often when they were dominating the LOS. Also, when our corners were giving each receiver an 8 yard cushion before every snap, why not deek and dump your way down the field? We were essentially handing them 4-5 free yards per play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think you're taking into account how dreadful we were against the run. Teams had no need to throw deep that often when they were dominating the LOS. Also, when our corners were giving each receiver an 8 yard cushion before every snap, why not deek and dump your way down the field? We were essentially handing them 4-5 free yards per play

 

I know far too well about our defense against the run.  Why we have Star, Short and Cole added to our roster.

 

OK let me put it this way.  Too many people want to point out or use how the percent number as a gauge to how good our pass defense was.  When you look at it.  Especially total passing yards 240.9 was 14th.  Our longest play from scrimmage was 60 yds.  Still not bad. 

 

I saw an article on Cat Scratch that showed we played cover 3 most of the season so the Safeties could help out against the run which opened quick outs and slants as the #1 target area.  Lots of completions but not many yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, a guy catches a quick slant and gets wrapped up immediately IMO is better than giving up longer completions but few catches.

 

Most defensive coaches would likely agree with you.

 

The most important part of defense though?  Points.

 

Don't give 'em up.  Get 'em when you can, or get the ball so the offense can get 'em.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With QBs in the league completing 60%, or better, of their passes, you just hang on and hope for the best. Keep the play in front of you to limit the splash plays. Make the O work their butts off to move the ball. Stop the run, and play the screen well helps. But all in all it is damm near impossible to stop todays QBs.

By keeping the play in front of you it allows you to play with your eyes up, and it makes teams work to move the ball. With our front 4 we should see more short passing plays. Almost like glorified runs. Make the tackle, make them work, get them frustrated, maybe you get some turnovers when they try to do too much.

Ah hellz, I don't know. Keep them in front of you and make the damm tackle. I can live with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...