Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Numbers Game.


koolkatluke

Recommended Posts

Simply how do you see the numbers breaking down right now?

 

 

QB - 3

 

RB - 3

 

FB - 2

 

WR - 6

 

TE - 3

 

Oline - 9

 

Dline - 9

 

LB - 6

 

CB - 5

 

Safety - 4

 

Kicker - 1

 

Punter - 1

 

and JJ

 

I can see only keeping 2 QB's on the roster  and maybe 8 olinmen But most everything else seem solid.

 

 Who they  think they can stash on the Practice Squad could have a effect also.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to know everyone's salary to make an educated guess. Right now, only the top 51 salaries are counting toward the cap. On final cuts day, we have to count all 53 against the cap.

 

That'll be the tiebreaker between players that haven't separated from the others. The trick of keeping players we like for next year by putting them on IR may not be used as much this year, either. Players on IR also count toward the cap, so Gettleman may just outright release players instead of IRing them.

 

It's going to be a balancing act between most ability and least cap figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we go 8 Dline

New normally have carried 9 DL.

I would think that the staff would like to carry a 5th DE if one if the young guys flash. I say this because we often slide CJ and Hardy inside on passing downs.

But, of course, this is just speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the 4 DE's (Hardy, CJ, Alexsander , and Addison) and the 4 DT's (Edwards, Cole, Star, KK) are locks. JMo they are either going to carry 1 more DT or DE.

has anyone heard or seen much from colin cole in camp? it'd be great if he was a solid rotation piece 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to know everyone's salary to make an educated guess. Right now, only the top 51 salaries are counting toward the cap. On final cuts day, we have to count all 53 against the cap.

 

That'll be the tiebreaker between players that haven't separated from the others. The trick of keeping players we like for next year by putting them on IR may not be used as much this year, either. Players on IR also count toward the cap, so Gettleman may just outright release players instead of IRing them.

 

It's going to be a balancing act between most ability and least cap figure.

 

 

Yes and no.

 

For example, there's a thing called the veteran minimum salary benefit. Check this out from a recent article re: Eric Wright's contract:

 

When a player is signed for the veteran minimum, there is something called the veteran minimum salary benefit. This gives teams a salary cap credit between the signed salary, and the base salary of a two-year veteran's salary of $555,000. The 49ers signed Kassim Osgood to a one-year veteran's minimum contract of $940,000, and Lavelle Hawkins to a one-year veteran's minimum contract of $715,000. For the purposes of the salary cap, their contracts only count $555,000 against the cap, with the rest being charged to "Player Benefits". The team can also pay out bonus compensation up to $65,000 on top of the deal.

 

 

Source: http://www.ninersnation.com/2013/8/11/4611466/eric-wright-contract-san-francisco-49ers-veteran-minimum-salary-benefit

 

 

Granted, if they make even $1 over vet minimum, the whole salary counts against the cap (as was the case with Wright who signed for $750,001)

 

But of those fringe players who will be in discussion for the final few roster spots, how many of them are going to be making enough to have a serious impact on the cap? And we're not exactly strapped for space this year. I'm betting salary comes less into play here than you think. Are you willing to sacrifice pure talent or upside to save $200k?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...