Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A couple thoughts about our preseason offense


CRA

Recommended Posts

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kinda agree. I mean Fua played forever with the first team. I haven't seen many screens to take advantage of the blitzing defenders either. We will see a bit more game 3 of preseason because the team needs some offensive production and confidence, but we won't be doing anything cutting edge and innovative until week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

1st time I've agreed with you in a long time.

 

We've shown nothing and pretty much ran vanilla stuff to evaluate players.

 

No QB dives, Bootlegs or Play action in the Red Zone. All are parts of our Red Zone packages.

 

No Read option or Smoke screens to Smitty which are a big part of this offense.

 

Vanilla Zone and Man coverage with simple blitzes and Dline stunts on Defense. We all know Mcdermont and Rivera got more schemes for this defense then they are showing in the preseason.

 

If people would take the time and look they would see we are showing nothing in this preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Huddle. Some folks understand what is going on. Some are worried they are seeing a precursor to the regular season. Nothing anyone says will change anybodies mind.

 

I can only recall 2 screens. Both to Barner, and both from DA. Our RBs catch plenty of passes when our O is clicking.

 

We have used zero misdirection, read option, or anything other than off tackle or up the gut.

 

We are using no motion and running basic routes.

 

In other words. Our O is as vanilla as it can get.

 

On D, we are mixing and matching personnel with an eye on evaluation. Very few blitzes or stunts.

 

Running basic cover 2 and zone. Very little man to man, or bump and run. Putting no pressure on the CBs.

 

In short. The D is pretty much as vanilla as it can get.

 

tldr version. It is the preseason. We are evaluating. It sucks for fans. But it is important for the coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st time I've agreed with you in a long time.

 

We've shown nothing and pretty much ran vanilla stuff to evaluate players.

 

No QB dives, Bootlegs or Play action in the Red Zone. All are parts of our Red Zone packages.

 

No Read option or Smoke screens to Smitty which are a big part of this offense.

 

Vanilla Zone and Man coverage with simple blitzes and Dline stunts on Defense. We all know Mcdermont and Rivera got more schemes for this defense then they are showing in the preseason.

 

If people would take the time and look they would see we are showing nothing in this preseason.

Beat me to it. Well said anyway. Bastar.... lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Huddle. Some folks understand what is going on. Some are worried they are seeing a precursor to the regular season. Nothing anyone says will change anybodies mind.

 

I can only recall 2 screens. Both to Barner, and both from DA. Our RBs catch plenty of passes when our O is clicking.

 

We have used zero misdirection, read option, or anything other than off tackle or up the gut.

 

We are using no motion and running basic routes.

 

In other words. Our O is as vanilla as it can get.

 

On D, we are mixing and matching personnel with an eye on evaluation. Very few blitzes or stunts.

 

Running basic cover 2 and zone. Very little man to man, or bump and run. Putting no pressure on the CBs.

 

In short. The D is pretty much as vanilla as it can get.

 

tldr version. It is the preseason. We are evaluating. It sucks for fans. But it is important for the coaches.

 

Hubby gets it. Good post a lot more in dept then mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hubby gets it. Good post a lot more in dept then mine.

You covered it well enough. Petty amazing we both pretty much said the same thing at pretty much the same time though.

I saw this thread started by CRA and was not expecting a rational well thought out post that didn't have any negative connotations to it. I was thinking, here we go again.

But hey, even CRA gets it. Who'd a thunk it. Just kidding.

I know the players want to win. The coaches do as well. But I also know that finding out who can, or can't, do what, is more important. Unfortunately, most fans see the bad, and that is what they take away from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You covered it well enough. Petty amazing we both pretty much said the same thing at pretty much the same time though.

I saw this thread started by CRA and was not expecting a rational well thought out post that didn't have any negative connotations to it. I was thinking, here we go again.

But hey, even CRA gets it. Who'd a thunk it. Just kidding.

I know the players want to win. The coaches do as well. But I also know that finding out who can, or can't, do what, is more important. Unfortunately, most fans see the bad, and that is what they take away from it.

 

Yeah crazy concept. Trying to evaluate players at the bottom of your roster in games that don't count.

 

 

 

Side Note: I thought CRA was going that way when I saw the thread 1st to.

 

It's nice to see him looking at it in terms of what a actual Coaching staff looks for in the Preseason.

 

I can see the difference in the Gettlemen's influence to Preseason compare to Hurney's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

Very well said. The deal with preseason is to see who can play the right way. Who can fight through blocks the right way, who stays in the right lanes, who can make the right block, who runs the right route the right way, and most importantly, who can do their job the right way?

Keeping the plays simple is the best way to evaluate. That way the coaches know exactly what they are looking at/for. They are looking for players that can get the job done, and do it the right way.

Some teams use preseason as practice. They run all their plays and don't care who knows it. Rivera is old school, as you well know, he likes to keep it simple and evaluate every player from a small pool of plays. Not running a hundred plays makes evaluation easier.

Ah hellz, its late. I'm done preaching. Good thread starter. Even if it was not expected. I really thought you were going to find something negative to harp over. Thanks for a thread worth getting involved in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope Bryce balls out. Wouldn't bet the farm on it though. Morgan has to be practical though. He was placed into a situation where he was compelled to give Bryce a long look. There really haven't been any more practical options due to who has been available at the position. The Panthers had already put their chips in with Bryce, so putting more chips in by borrowing against the future and stacking on that by borrowing against the future without really having the requisite draft capital was a nonstarter. We could either dump Bryce and go dumpster diving for known and unknown JAGs at the position, or take out chances and let it play out with Bryce and hope for acceptable returns. Due to what looks like some good moves in the draft and free agency, it appears like we're finally getting into a position where we can take a swing again if need be without destroying the core of the team. I understand that you'll believe it when you see it, but Dan is gonna move on if Bryce can't cut it. There are too many professionals lives and careers tied to Bryce to simply accept the status quo. 
    • Football is the ultimate team sport. No sport is more dependent on others for your success - including coaching. I don't know if Bryce is the guy, but I do know this has been a very bad team all around since he got here. One of the worst o-lines and coaching staffs I've ever seen his rookie year. One of the worst defenses and receiving groups (including TEs) I've ever seen his 2nd season - with a rookie HC and OC. An improving WR group his 3rd season mostly due to a rookie. The only other WR of note didn't really play well until after the 10th game of the season due to injury. Still no receiving TE to speak of. And lost games because of the worst pass rush in the NFL. And the only speed he's ever had on the field was DJ Chark. A washed up DJ Chark that played here one year and has had 31 yards receiving since leaving.  Carolina had no business moving up for a QB in 2023. They weren't ready. Especially if it meant trading your only good WR to do it. Now finally there's potential on defense. Potential on o-line. Potential at WR, including some actual speed in a game where speed kills. If BY falls on his face this season, then he has to own it. Situation may not be perfect, but it's at least NFL average across the board. I won't beat him up for being bad in bad situations on a bad team. But a 4th year QB has to be able to control the offense and make players/coaches right. The team looks good enough on paper to show what he can do now.   
×
×
  • Create New...