Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any international business or economic smart guys want to help me with my mid-term?


Mayor Qumiby

Recommended Posts

I would have to write your term paper to answer. Some basics are Japan has gone through two "lost Decades" after stagflation led to 20 years of a recession in Japan with inflation rising to the point that Japanese banks are investing their money in UK banks that are taking advantage of situation by charging negative interest rate, ie Japan has to pay them interest for holding their money, liquidity trap is basically the economic stimulus the US did where they gave all the money bailing out the banks so they wouldn't fail and Japan has a history of similiar actions. China is argued to also be currently in liquidity trap and possibly heading for stagflation which the continued growth of their GDP has helped avoid.

I would recommend taking 3 sheets, one per country, and write down a point by point what has happened in each economy. Japan has been dealing with 20 years of issues and refers to that a "lost decades" and have basically haven't found a long term solution and is like worst case scenerio of all 3. The US had a stagflation period in 70's and overcame them eventually, but then had housing bubble and recession of 2008 which led to liquidity trap and stimulus packages and is now in recovery but with slowing GDP is risking another stagflation even with unemployment still high. China is in a period of unprecedented growth, but also has many issues. There are a lot of differences with how they arrive at many of their economic stats and the true numbers could be hiding a economy on verge of recession. For instance, their unemployment rates are cited around 5%, but only account urban numbers that register for unemployment rates, so true rates are like 10% in cities and over 20% in rural areas. also their GDP is arrived to differently. for example their new construction is counted towards new growth regardless of the fact they are constructing ghost cities with 90%+ vacancy. There is a news show called VICE that did a news story on this, I'll see if I can find it.

Write a recent economic history of the 3 countries individually and the compare contrast they are asking for will be very obvious and much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have to write your term paper to answer. Some basics are Japan has gone through two "lost Decades" after stagflation led to 20 years of a recession in Japan with inflation rising to the point that Japanese banks are investing their money in UK banks that are taking advantage of situation by charging negative interest rate, ie Japan has to pay them interest for holding their money, liquidity trap is basically the economic stimulus the US did where they gave all the money bailing out the banks so they wouldn't fail and Japan has a history of similiar actions. China is argued to also be currently in liquidity trap and possibly heading for stagflation which the continued growth of their GDP has helped avoid.

I would recommend taking 3 sheets, one per country, and write down a point by point what has happened in each economy. Japan has been dealing with 20 years of issues and refers to that a "lost decades" and have basically haven't found a long term solution and is like worst case scenerio of all 3. The US had a stagflation period in 70's and overcame them eventually, but then had housing bubble and recession of 2008 which led to liquidity trap and stimulus packages and is now in recovery but with slowing GDP is risking another stagflation even with unemployment still high. China is in a period of unprecedented growth, but also has many issues. There are a lot of differences with how they arrive at many of their economic stats and the true numbers could be hiding a economy on verge of recession. For instance, their unemployment rates are cited around 5%, but only account urban numbers that register for unemployment rates, so true rates are like 10% in cities and over 20% in rural areas. also their GDP is arrived to differently. for example their new construction is counted towards new growth regardless of the fact they are constructing ghost cities with 90%+ vacancy. There is a news show called VICE that did a news story on this, I'll see if I can find it.

Write a recent economic history of the 3 countries individually and the compare contrast they are asking for will be very obvious and much easier.

C-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that is a terrible question in all seriousness.

 

I'm with you. It's not a very specific topic question. It's kind of all over the place. Especially the research part, it seems like you could literally write about any investment and as long as you're thorough, you'd be ok. All of those countries invest all over the world in all sorts of different ways and for multiple different reasons. The only minimal effort involved would be researching current economic trends for each nation to answer the first part. Overall, it's a bad question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...