Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any international business or economic smart guys want to help me with my mid-term?


Mayor Qumiby

Recommended Posts

I would have to write your term paper to answer. Some basics are Japan has gone through two "lost Decades" after stagflation led to 20 years of a recession in Japan with inflation rising to the point that Japanese banks are investing their money in UK banks that are taking advantage of situation by charging negative interest rate, ie Japan has to pay them interest for holding their money, liquidity trap is basically the economic stimulus the US did where they gave all the money bailing out the banks so they wouldn't fail and Japan has a history of similiar actions. China is argued to also be currently in liquidity trap and possibly heading for stagflation which the continued growth of their GDP has helped avoid.

I would recommend taking 3 sheets, one per country, and write down a point by point what has happened in each economy. Japan has been dealing with 20 years of issues and refers to that a "lost decades" and have basically haven't found a long term solution and is like worst case scenerio of all 3. The US had a stagflation period in 70's and overcame them eventually, but then had housing bubble and recession of 2008 which led to liquidity trap and stimulus packages and is now in recovery but with slowing GDP is risking another stagflation even with unemployment still high. China is in a period of unprecedented growth, but also has many issues. There are a lot of differences with how they arrive at many of their economic stats and the true numbers could be hiding a economy on verge of recession. For instance, their unemployment rates are cited around 5%, but only account urban numbers that register for unemployment rates, so true rates are like 10% in cities and over 20% in rural areas. also their GDP is arrived to differently. for example their new construction is counted towards new growth regardless of the fact they are constructing ghost cities with 90%+ vacancy. There is a news show called VICE that did a news story on this, I'll see if I can find it.

Write a recent economic history of the 3 countries individually and the compare contrast they are asking for will be very obvious and much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have to write your term paper to answer. Some basics are Japan has gone through two "lost Decades" after stagflation led to 20 years of a recession in Japan with inflation rising to the point that Japanese banks are investing their money in UK banks that are taking advantage of situation by charging negative interest rate, ie Japan has to pay them interest for holding their money, liquidity trap is basically the economic stimulus the US did where they gave all the money bailing out the banks so they wouldn't fail and Japan has a history of similiar actions. China is argued to also be currently in liquidity trap and possibly heading for stagflation which the continued growth of their GDP has helped avoid.

I would recommend taking 3 sheets, one per country, and write down a point by point what has happened in each economy. Japan has been dealing with 20 years of issues and refers to that a "lost decades" and have basically haven't found a long term solution and is like worst case scenerio of all 3. The US had a stagflation period in 70's and overcame them eventually, but then had housing bubble and recession of 2008 which led to liquidity trap and stimulus packages and is now in recovery but with slowing GDP is risking another stagflation even with unemployment still high. China is in a period of unprecedented growth, but also has many issues. There are a lot of differences with how they arrive at many of their economic stats and the true numbers could be hiding a economy on verge of recession. For instance, their unemployment rates are cited around 5%, but only account urban numbers that register for unemployment rates, so true rates are like 10% in cities and over 20% in rural areas. also their GDP is arrived to differently. for example their new construction is counted towards new growth regardless of the fact they are constructing ghost cities with 90%+ vacancy. There is a news show called VICE that did a news story on this, I'll see if I can find it.

Write a recent economic history of the 3 countries individually and the compare contrast they are asking for will be very obvious and much easier.

C-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that is a terrible question in all seriousness.

 

I'm with you. It's not a very specific topic question. It's kind of all over the place. Especially the research part, it seems like you could literally write about any investment and as long as you're thorough, you'd be ok. All of those countries invest all over the world in all sorts of different ways and for multiple different reasons. The only minimal effort involved would be researching current economic trends for each nation to answer the first part. Overall, it's a bad question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...