Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any international business or economic smart guys want to help me with my mid-term?


Mayor Qumiby

Recommended Posts

I would have to write your term paper to answer. Some basics are Japan has gone through two "lost Decades" after stagflation led to 20 years of a recession in Japan with inflation rising to the point that Japanese banks are investing their money in UK banks that are taking advantage of situation by charging negative interest rate, ie Japan has to pay them interest for holding their money, liquidity trap is basically the economic stimulus the US did where they gave all the money bailing out the banks so they wouldn't fail and Japan has a history of similiar actions. China is argued to also be currently in liquidity trap and possibly heading for stagflation which the continued growth of their GDP has helped avoid.

I would recommend taking 3 sheets, one per country, and write down a point by point what has happened in each economy. Japan has been dealing with 20 years of issues and refers to that a "lost decades" and have basically haven't found a long term solution and is like worst case scenerio of all 3. The US had a stagflation period in 70's and overcame them eventually, but then had housing bubble and recession of 2008 which led to liquidity trap and stimulus packages and is now in recovery but with slowing GDP is risking another stagflation even with unemployment still high. China is in a period of unprecedented growth, but also has many issues. There are a lot of differences with how they arrive at many of their economic stats and the true numbers could be hiding a economy on verge of recession. For instance, their unemployment rates are cited around 5%, but only account urban numbers that register for unemployment rates, so true rates are like 10% in cities and over 20% in rural areas. also their GDP is arrived to differently. for example their new construction is counted towards new growth regardless of the fact they are constructing ghost cities with 90%+ vacancy. There is a news show called VICE that did a news story on this, I'll see if I can find it.

Write a recent economic history of the 3 countries individually and the compare contrast they are asking for will be very obvious and much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have to write your term paper to answer. Some basics are Japan has gone through two "lost Decades" after stagflation led to 20 years of a recession in Japan with inflation rising to the point that Japanese banks are investing their money in UK banks that are taking advantage of situation by charging negative interest rate, ie Japan has to pay them interest for holding their money, liquidity trap is basically the economic stimulus the US did where they gave all the money bailing out the banks so they wouldn't fail and Japan has a history of similiar actions. China is argued to also be currently in liquidity trap and possibly heading for stagflation which the continued growth of their GDP has helped avoid.

I would recommend taking 3 sheets, one per country, and write down a point by point what has happened in each economy. Japan has been dealing with 20 years of issues and refers to that a "lost decades" and have basically haven't found a long term solution and is like worst case scenerio of all 3. The US had a stagflation period in 70's and overcame them eventually, but then had housing bubble and recession of 2008 which led to liquidity trap and stimulus packages and is now in recovery but with slowing GDP is risking another stagflation even with unemployment still high. China is in a period of unprecedented growth, but also has many issues. There are a lot of differences with how they arrive at many of their economic stats and the true numbers could be hiding a economy on verge of recession. For instance, their unemployment rates are cited around 5%, but only account urban numbers that register for unemployment rates, so true rates are like 10% in cities and over 20% in rural areas. also their GDP is arrived to differently. for example their new construction is counted towards new growth regardless of the fact they are constructing ghost cities with 90%+ vacancy. There is a news show called VICE that did a news story on this, I'll see if I can find it.

Write a recent economic history of the 3 countries individually and the compare contrast they are asking for will be very obvious and much easier.

C-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that is a terrible question in all seriousness.

 

I'm with you. It's not a very specific topic question. It's kind of all over the place. Especially the research part, it seems like you could literally write about any investment and as long as you're thorough, you'd be ok. All of those countries invest all over the world in all sorts of different ways and for multiple different reasons. The only minimal effort involved would be researching current economic trends for each nation to answer the first part. Overall, it's a bad question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interestingly I think we have kind of of gone through this as an organization. Richardson implemented an FO driven tank. Bad roster, no cash spent, coach uninterested. It may have been for different reasons but I think the results were the same. A team that wasn't going to win many if any games. We ended up with the #1 pick. Cam Newton came in and changed the franchise. It worked, but Cam himself pointed to the losing culture in the locker room needing to be changed. It probably took about 2-3 years for that to happen. Tank worked pretty damn well for us. Cam is one of one. Not another like him, everyone can't deliver on his draft status AND change a culture basically on his own.  So as an exercise here are the last 30 #1 picks. If you tanked and got to pick #1 how many of these guys do you think were worth it? Not just good players, but franchise changers. Guys who will take your culture and shift it so the tank was actually worth it. I would say maybe 9 or 10 guys would be worth a tank, pending the last 5 picks?    2025: Cam Ward (Miami (FL)) - Tennessee Titans 2024: Caleb Williams (USC) – Chicago Bears 2023: Bryce Young (Alabama) – Carolina Panthers 2022: Travon Walker (Georgia) – Jacksonville Jaguars 2021: Trevor Lawrence (Clemson) – Jacksonville Jaguars 2020: Joe Burrow (LSU) – Cincinnati Bengals 2019: Kyler Murray (Oklahoma) – Arizona Cardinals 2018: Baker Mayfield (Oklahoma) – Cleveland Browns 2017: Myles Garrett (Texas A&M) – Cleveland Browns 2016: Jared Goff (California) – Los Angeles Rams 2015: Jameis Winston (Florida State) – Tampa Bay Buccaneers 2014: Jadeveon Clowney (South Carolina) – Houston Texans 2013: Eric Fisher (Central Michigan) – Kansas City Chiefs 2012: Andrew Luck (Stanford) – Indianapolis Colts 2011: Cam Newton (Auburn) – Carolina Panthers 2010: Sam Bradford (Oklahoma) – St. Louis Rams 2009: Matthew Stafford (Georgia) – Detroit Lions 2008: Jake Long (Michigan) – Miami Dolphins 2007: JaMarcus Russell (LSU) – Oakland Raiders 2006: Mario Williams (North Carolina State) – Houston Texans 2005: Alex Smith (Utah) – San Francisco 49ers 2004: Eli Manning (Mississippi) – San Diego Chargers 2003: Carson Palmer (USC) – Cincinnati Bengals 2002: David Carr (Fresno State) – Houston Texans 2001: Michael Vick (Virginia Tech) – Atlanta Falcons 2000: Courtney Brown (Penn State) – Cleveland Browns 1999: Tim Couch (Kentucky) – Cleveland Browns 1998: Peyton Manning (Tennessee) – Indianapolis Colts 1997: Orlando Pace (Ohio State) – St. Louis Rams 1996: Keyshawn Johnson (USC) – New York Jets 1995: Ki-Jana Carter (Penn State) – Cincinnati Bengals
    • Nikishin is struggling to learn to speak both American and Canadian in such a short period of time
×
×
  • Create New...