Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dat Alice is not a mod

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

rodeo Veteran

rodeo

Posted
Posted

It'll be good for the forum in the long run, imo. I don't think it was ever the intent to just be a "Panthers" forum, that's why they took the "Panthers" out of the url and name. More fans of other teams = more ad revenue, and expanding the mod base out will help accomplish that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
88 Bronco Newbie

88 Bronco

Posted
Posted

It'll be good for the forum in the long run, imo. I don't think it was ever the intent to just be a "Panthers" forum, that's why they took the "Panthers" out of the url and name. More fans of other teams = more ad revenue, and expanding the mod base out will help accomplish that.

 

 

I think the Panther part was removed due to a threat from the Carolina Panthers front office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

It'll be good for the forum in the long run, imo. I don't think it was ever the intent to just be a "Panthers" forum, that's why they took the "Panthers" out of the url and name. More fans of other teams = more ad revenue, and expanding the mod base out will help accomplish that.

I think Zod just likes a little controversy....a little is good for keeping the regular crowd active.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

It'll be good for the forum in the long run, imo. I don't think it was ever the intent to just be a "Panthers" forum, that's why they took the "Panthers" out of the url and name. More fans of other teams = more ad revenue, and expanding the mod base out will help accomplish that.

I think Zod just likes a little controversy....a little is good for keeping the regular crowd active.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The NFL Shield At Midfield Grand Master

The NFL Shield At Midfield

Posted
Posted

i'll have you know that the forums i've moderated were much nicer and cost much more money to run than this one.  i've been moderating forums all over the world since i was 18.  my parents didn't help me at all except for when they gifted me $34,000 to get started.

 

my ban hammer is the nicest, most expensive one you can buy.  it comes with a hermes carrying case and it's the same one lebron james and kanye west use.  lmao you poors could never afford it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...