-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
.thumb.gif.f35aad759896324c3e174efcba5a66a6.gif)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
By Bear Hands · Posted
Totally. I'm less comparing them as players and using him as a reference point. I legitimately think Bryce is capable of being a better NFL QB than Kyler has been. Kyler has no clutch gene and doesn't seem to have a grip on the locker room, or much love for the game. Much different body types/strengths and weaknesses. Crazy to think-- but Kyler is at year 7 as a 1.01...38-48-1 on his career, 0-1 in the playoffs. He's somehow played well enough to keep it going but crazy to think he's barely even touched the playoffs. Hasn't done anything that special for the Cards. That's what you don't want to be stuck in. Cardinals are in softball purgatory with him. -
By kungfoodude · Posted
It's not analysis. There was no attempt to analyze anything or even convey new information at all. -
As to the topic, I've complained before about "superstar" mentality, i.e. the notion that you can win championships with one superstar player surrounded by a group of mediocre fill ins. It just doesn't work. The Manning-Brady rivalry was something of a showcase for that. The Colts general approach focused everything on Manning. The Patriots? Oh, they also had a superstar quarterback but they built a complete team, especially on the defensive side. This sort of thing is why I've argued many times that "system quarterback" should be to considered a description, not an insult. I know everybody loves the "MVP" athletic types, and they're fun to watch, but that's not necessarily the true path to consistent winning and championship glory.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.