Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For All That Went Wrong (AGAIN), Cause For Optimism...


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Same here man, and this has been moral victory central for the last 4 years.

 

Unfortunately, beggars can't be choosers.

 

Panther football fans for the last four years, more often than not, have had to settle for moral victories or none at all.

 

Having said that, if our offense can get rolling, we could have the best season in recent memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a team scores 7 points there is no "slight possibility that we didn't play as bad as it actually appeared"

They didn't play well enough to win, but that doesn't mean they didn't play well at all.

Having your defense only give up twelve points is generally enough to win a game, and would have been yesterday if not for some of the offensive struggles and that last turnover.

Yes we lost a low scoring defensive struggle, but we were in it, right up till the end.

In a season opener, I'll take that over getting blown out every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

props to the front 7 for stuffing one of the better RB's in the game Lynch... he had like 45 yards on 20 carries... and WOW thomas davis is a freaking monster, he looked like he was 22 out there flying around, and I don't think he missed a tackle.

 

if we can just get the secondary figured out we are a scary D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers lost.

 

The Panthers lost their opening game for the fifth consecutive time.

 

The Panthers have not been above .500 since December 2008.

 

There's a reason Ron Rivera was interviewed for head coaching positions by at least 12 teams... and not selected.

 

I'm so very happy DirecTV gave me Sunday Ticket free this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They didn't play well enough to win, but that doesn't mean they didn't play well at all.

Having your defense only give up twelve points is generally enough to win a game, and would have been yesterday if not for some of the offensive struggles and that last turnover.

Yes we lost a low scoring defensive struggle, but we were in it, right up till the end.

In a season opener, I'll take that over getting blown out every time.

 

And if defense was the only part of the team that would be fine. But when the offense has 7 points, and special teams has multiple stupid plays, the team didn't play well no matter how great the defense was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if defense was the only part of the team that would be fine. But when the offense has 7 points, and special teams has multiple stupid plays, the team didn't play well no matter how great the defense was.

 

Minus one fumble, I think they would have scored enough points to win, and against a very good defense.

 

Sadly, we don't get to take those plays away :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet if Deangelo doesn't fumble and we pull the game off we would all be "Superbowlz!!!"

It was a hard fought game that we lost against a good team.

Accepting that and realizing there is still 15 games left is not a losing mentality.

It is not "accepting losing" to undertstand we weren't going to go 16-0.

It isn't about moral victories, it is about maintaining confidence and knowing we should have won that game.

If we get beat by three TDs I would be on board. And I do understand the aggravation of losing another heartbreaking game. But maintaining a level head and seeing the bigger picture == losing mentality. It is actually the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet if Deangelo doesn't fumble and we pull the game off we would all be "Superbowlz!!!"

It was a hard fought game that we lost against a good team.

Accepting that and realizing there is still 15 games left is not a losing mentality.

It is not "accepting losing" to undertstand we weren't going to go 16-0.

It isn't about moral victories, it is about maintaining confidence and knowing we should have won that game.

If we get beat by three TDs I would be on board. And I do understand the aggravation of losing another heartbreaking game. But maintaining a level head and seeing the bigger picture == losing mentality. It is actually the opposite.

 

How is that not a moral victory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Moral victories" do not get you into the playoffs.

"Moral victories" do not show up in the W-L records.

"Moral victories" do not earn the head coach any vote of confidence.

 

"Moral victories" are for kids and recreation leagues, not for multi-million dollar athletes playing for millionaire/billionaire owners and the big-money sponsors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aside from losing my biggest concern is our passing game was anemic. For whatever reason I felt our passing gme looked the best in the Cam Newton era when we had Shockey at the other TE. Was it Schocky, the scheme or just having bigger targets I do not know. If we only have two receivers targeted it makes it easy for the defence to limit us. I am not ready to blame all this on LaFell but we have to mix it up with a second wr and rb. I saw very few deep patterns which is playing to Cams strenghs and very few passes to DWill.

 

As far as the loss I am less concerned about the fumble which was a tremendous defensive play and more concerned about the secondary and the passing game. I cannot believe LaFell Hixon Ginn and Edwards are only good for one pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those of you that think Seattle being a good team justifies losing well you better tell us next that it ain't no problem missing the playoffs again because we've got quality opponents out the wazoo on our schedule this year

"THOSE 9 TEAMS ARE GREAT TEAMS WE SHOULDN'T BE ASHAMED THAT WE COULDN'T EVEN GET TO .500 SO SACK UP ALL YOU CHICKEN LITTLES"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...