Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Balancing Our Offense Will Be A Fine Art

TylerDurden

By TylerDurden,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

If we're even able to do it successfully.

Why?

Aside from the obvious reasons, the general premise isn't breaking news, but the game has dramatically changed. As has been discussed ad nauseam here, "3 yards and a cloud of dust" philosophies aren't just outdated now, they're ancient.

Look at the stats from yesterday's opening day games and the picture becomes that much clearer...

Can you guess the league's leading rusher?

Terrelle Pryor. A QB. He ran for 112 yards.

Now another interesting stat. Shane Vereen was the only RB in the league to eclipse the 100 yard mark in week 1.

Wow, we picked a good time to invest boat loads of money in a football philosophical dinosaur.

So, I certainly hope Shula plans to utilize our RBs to our advantage without handicapping our offense's ability to make big plays in the passing game. He must find the right balance between using Cam to his maximum potential in the passing game while utilizing him effectively in running situations along with our RBs without turning our offense into a Woody Hayes' wet dream.

I have to say, I was not happy with the lack of designed runs for Cam yesterday. His ability to run on designed plays often is the difference between scoring or sending out the punting unit on any given drive. I hope to see more of that going forward b/c the beauty of Cam is the pressure he puts on a defense with his potential for big plays passing or running is invaluable. Shula must find that balance. There's a time for buckling your chin strap and using a show of force running the ball, but it doesn't require you to abandon what makes your offense successful and dynamic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

 

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want to them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

 

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

Unfortunately, he is the only one I trust with short yardage situations.  Although, Tolbert grinded one out.  There was some pretty nice designs in there that were executed well, but plenty blahs that weren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cary Kollins Experienced

Cary Kollins

Posted
Posted

Speaking of designed Cam runs, it's especailly frustrating in short yardage situations.  The 3rd and 2 comes to mind, I believe it was the first drive of the game.  We were moving the ball well with a mix of runs and intermediate throws.

 

Then we get the ball across the fifty and have a 3rd and 2, and Cam throws an incomplete pass.  I think that's the perfect situation for Cam to run the QB draw or QB power.  It's almost guaranteed to pick up a couple of yards.  If you are going to throw a pass there, at least make it a play-action. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
  • Author
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

But that's why Cam's designed runs are so crucial. They don't require him to be a "battering ram." In my observations, his biggest gains come from designed runs out of pistol and/or spread formations. There wasn't nearly enough of those in there yesterday. We don't need him to run straight into a pile of defenders out of a goal line formation. He needs to operate with the chance that the pass could be coming, which is what makes him so dangerous to defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Collaborator

teeray

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

I care more about first downs than who is getting paid what

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kdrh5 Newbie

kdrh5

Posted
Posted

I don't think we have any excuses to not be able to put points on the board for our defense. Green Bay has an offensive line full of no-names. I can't remember when Pittsburgh was ever good at pass protecting. San Francisco, like us, has one great, yet aging slot receiver, a juiced up tight end as their number two option, and a bunch of guys, yet their QB just passed for 10,000 yards yesterday. There are plenty of winning teams with holes in their rosters just as big, if not bigger than ours, but they have success in spite of. That needs to change here and I expect better on Sundays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I also thought the HB screens were underutilized as well.

And as far as Cam, I also think they've been telling him to get down quicker which makes me think that using him as a runner is something they're trying to deemphasize and avoid. There were a few times when he did run yesterday that it appeared he dropped voluntarily a lot quicker than he ever did before, even when the first down was within reach. He appears to be avoiding contact as much as possible, which is smart, but I think it signals a shift in overall philosophy as far as how they want to use him this season... And that, I don't like

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

Speaking of designed Cam runs, it's especailly frustrating in short yardage situations.  The 3rd and 2 comes to mind, I believe it was the first drive of the game.  We were moving the ball well with a mix of runs and intermediate throws.

 

Then we get the ball across the fifty and have a 3rd and 2, and Cam throws an incomplete pass.  I think that's the perfect situation for Cam to run the QB draw or QB power.  It's almost guaranteed to pick up a couple of yards.  If you are going to throw a pass there, at least make it a play-action. 

Later in the game Cam ran some power runs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ok2h8pep
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By ok2h8pep · Posted

      Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • 45catfan
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By 45catfan · Posted

      Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • MHS831
      Round 1: The Carolina Panthers select OT Monroe Freeling (Georgia)

      By MHS831 · Posted

      When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...