Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Balancing Our Offense Will Be A Fine Art

Proudiddy

By Proudiddy,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

If we're even able to do it successfully.

Why?

Aside from the obvious reasons, the general premise isn't breaking news, but the game has dramatically changed. As has been discussed ad nauseam here, "3 yards and a cloud of dust" philosophies aren't just outdated now, they're ancient.

Look at the stats from yesterday's opening day games and the picture becomes that much clearer...

Can you guess the league's leading rusher?

Terrelle Pryor. A QB. He ran for 112 yards.

Now another interesting stat. Shane Vereen was the only RB in the league to eclipse the 100 yard mark in week 1.

Wow, we picked a good time to invest boat loads of money in a football philosophical dinosaur.

So, I certainly hope Shula plans to utilize our RBs to our advantage without handicapping our offense's ability to make big plays in the passing game. He must find the right balance between using Cam to his maximum potential in the passing game while utilizing him effectively in running situations along with our RBs without turning our offense into a Woody Hayes' wet dream.

I have to say, I was not happy with the lack of designed runs for Cam yesterday. His ability to run on designed plays often is the difference between scoring or sending out the punting unit on any given drive. I hope to see more of that going forward b/c the beauty of Cam is the pressure he puts on a defense with his potential for big plays passing or running is invaluable. Shula must find that balance. There's a time for buckling your chin strap and using a show of force running the ball, but it doesn't require you to abandon what makes your offense successful and dynamic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

 

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want to them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

 

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

Unfortunately, he is the only one I trust with short yardage situations.  Although, Tolbert grinded one out.  There was some pretty nice designs in there that were executed well, but plenty blahs that weren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cary Kollins Experienced

Cary Kollins

Posted
Posted

Speaking of designed Cam runs, it's especailly frustrating in short yardage situations.  The 3rd and 2 comes to mind, I believe it was the first drive of the game.  We were moving the ball well with a mix of runs and intermediate throws.

 

Then we get the ball across the fifty and have a 3rd and 2, and Cam throws an incomplete pass.  I think that's the perfect situation for Cam to run the QB draw or QB power.  It's almost guaranteed to pick up a couple of yards.  If you are going to throw a pass there, at least make it a play-action. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

But that's why Cam's designed runs are so crucial. They don't require him to be a "battering ram." In my observations, his biggest gains come from designed runs out of pistol and/or spread formations. There wasn't nearly enough of those in there yesterday. We don't need him to run straight into a pile of defenders out of a goal line formation. He needs to operate with the chance that the pass could be coming, which is what makes him so dangerous to defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Rookie

teeray

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

I care more about first downs than who is getting paid what

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kdrh5 Newbie

kdrh5

Posted
Posted

I don't think we have any excuses to not be able to put points on the board for our defense. Green Bay has an offensive line full of no-names. I can't remember when Pittsburgh was ever good at pass protecting. San Francisco, like us, has one great, yet aging slot receiver, a juiced up tight end as their number two option, and a bunch of guys, yet their QB just passed for 10,000 yards yesterday. There are plenty of winning teams with holes in their rosters just as big, if not bigger than ours, but they have success in spite of. That needs to change here and I expect better on Sundays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I also thought the HB screens were underutilized as well.

And as far as Cam, I also think they've been telling him to get down quicker which makes me think that using him as a runner is something they're trying to deemphasize and avoid. There were a few times when he did run yesterday that it appeared he dropped voluntarily a lot quicker than he ever did before, even when the first down was within reach. He appears to be avoiding contact as much as possible, which is smart, but I think it signals a shift in overall philosophy as far as how they want to use him this season... And that, I don't like

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

Speaking of designed Cam runs, it's especailly frustrating in short yardage situations.  The 3rd and 2 comes to mind, I believe it was the first drive of the game.  We were moving the ball well with a mix of runs and intermediate throws.

 

Then we get the ball across the fifty and have a 3rd and 2, and Cam throws an incomplete pass.  I think that's the perfect situation for Cam to run the QB draw or QB power.  It's almost guaranteed to pick up a couple of yards.  If you are going to throw a pass there, at least make it a play-action. 

Later in the game Cam ran some power runs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Joe Person: Ickey is expected to be extended, Mays is someone we want to keep long term, TE, LB and OLB are our biggest needs heading into the offseason

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I mean, but there is ample evidence that exists currently in the NFL and historically that if you have a talented or moderately talented team then one of the biggest upgrades you can make is at QB. It yields the biggest returns. I don't think even Prime Greg Olsen is going to make Bryce suddenly look like a stud QB. We have invested immense amounts of money on the OL and tremendous amounts of draft resources on WR's. And have added an additional extremely capable RB. At some point, the main problem is Bryce. We are at that point.  That being said, we don't need to go "Full Bryce" again and sell the farm to upgrade at QB. Be intelligent and patient. Try to get better by whatever means become available WHILE continuing to make the roster better. At the bare minimum, you slowly build an upper half of the NFL talented roster that is at least a potential draw for some free agent QB's. IMO, Bryce is clearly not the answer. I don't think anyone in our organization thinks that way but if they do, it's not the end of the world. Throw as many reasonable darts as you can through free agency and the draft until either you get a bullseye or a top 10-15 option becomes available in free agency.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

    • MHS831
      Joe Person: Ickey is expected to be extended, Mays is someone we want to keep long term, TE, LB and OLB are our biggest needs heading into the offseason

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I think the best way to make Bryce better is to make everyone around him better.  This is why I advocate for a stud (top 5, eventually) TE.  I mean, when we have been a good franchise, we have had a stud TE (Walls, Olsen) and ILB (Beason, Mills, Morgan, Luke, etc) so it is in our DNA.  Expect us to address these areas this year.  (An Olsen or Walls would help Bryce a lot).  In terms of productivity, I think we are going to work with XL for one more season and ride the TMac / Coker momentum.  Where else could we find a position to improve productivity?  TE.  A position that caters to Bryce's style and shortcomings, a stud TE gives him another weapon he has not had. The Panthers run a lot of 2-TE sets (I have seen 3) and they have a blocker (Tremble) who is great in the run game, a balanced TE (Evans), and Sanders is supposed to be the pass-catching TE. He had 340 yards last season and he has about 170 this year.  If we are going to play around with XL for another season, it only makes up to add to Bryce's weapons in a way that does not put XL on the bench, basically ending his development. It makes sense to bring in a pass-catching dawg.  The way the offense is designed, I see carrying 4, but its not ideal. Having said that, I mentioned Oregon's Sadiq in another thread, but I am starting to warm up to Vanderbilt's Stowers and, in the Olsen/Walls mold, I kinda like Endries from Texas.  Of course, Stowers is probably going in round 2 and Endries in 3 or later. I still say, 5 months before the draft, that I would not be surprised if we take a TE very early.
×
×
  • Create New...