Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR Crop Looking Pretty Strong for 2014


MHS831

Recommended Posts

I realize there is another thread about WRs, but it is rather old and ran its course before the season.   I am not an expert and do not begin to pretend to have an eye for WR talent that will convert to the NFL (I thought Jarrett was a steal), but I look for things I never used to care about now.  These things are:

 

1. Can he beat the jam.  This is huge in the NFL.  If you can't beat the jam, you will be jammed every play.  I shall call thee, "Smuckers." (That is a jam company.)

2. Speed after the cut.  It is not measured with a watch so it is hard to analyze, but I look for separation and explosion out of the cut.  The WRs with good explosion tend to get bigger cushions before the snap.  So, a lot of yards is a bit deceiving.  Players who have speed and no real explosion are often played in press man coverage.  These players occasionally burn the CB. 

3. Watch the Safeties.  A good WR is always on the safeties' radar.  The roll toward him a lot.  Problem here is, on TV, you miss this a good bit.

4. Hands.  Can he catch the ball without a bobble.  I do not like body catchers--body catching is OK for some on here, and, at times, it is smart.  But a WR who drops passes in his hands or bobbles them is not going to make it in the NFL.  Body catching is a sign that the WR does not trust his ability to catch the ball cleanly--that is why he does it when he does not have to.

5.  Route running.  Solid route running reflects a knowledge of football as much as it is needed to get open.  It requires patience because timing is critical in the NFL.  Breaking off routes because a WR feels open is a huge mistake because many NFL defenses make you feel open when you are not.  It also causes the QB to rush throws and the WR to catch the ball on the "wrong foot",

 

That is about all I know to look for, and everything above is what I stole from listening to the pros.  Not an original thought up there.  Not one.

 

Here is why I am excited about the WR crop this year:

 

There are 3 WRs who are legit first rounders, which means that there are probably 3 more who will be by the end of the season.  If there are 5 first rounders, we have a legitimate shot to get one in the first.  However, the second round will have some gems too.

 

First Round Locks

Watkins, Clemson.  He is a stud.

Lee, USC,  He could be a very special WR in the NFL--but he hails from the land of Jarrett and Colbert. 

Evans. Tex Tech.  I love this guy.  He is big, has speed, and can move.  Reminds me of Julio. 

 

Others who may become first rounders with solid seasons

Moncrief, Ole Miss.  This player can get vertical.

Matthews, Vandy.  He is nothing special on paper, but everything to Vandy.  He sees double teams and the best DBs in the SEC every week. 

 

Personally, I think there is some talent at Rutgers, Louisville, and scattered throughout the SEC. 

 

I have not shopped around much yet,but these are names I have noticed.  I say, compared to the last few years, this WR crop is a TON better--- We should come away with one or two in the first 4 rounds.

 

My pick?  Moncrief is realistic.  I expect Carolina to be picking around 20, and he should be there.  If any of the top 3 fall, yes.

 

That is all.  Just peeking into the WR jar for next year and thought I would share my enthusiasm.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one hand, we have guys here that rave about how Cam set all kinds of records in passing his first two seasons.  Then, we turn around and say that WR is our main need.  Where did all the All Pro receivers Cam used in his first two seasons go?  OR, is it something else?

 

I dare say, the OLine is should be our priority.  Have an incredible run game and make people bring 8 in the box, and a ton of WR's will be open.

 

Sorry, you have a good list, but I am still all about the lines,  We did the DLine thing last draft and it seems to be working out.  Now, lets go out and the the same on the OLine.

 

I do understand the Smith is getting a bit older and we will need a number one at some point, but if we don't fix the line, it won't matter.  Remember, Gross is not the youngest thing either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

both is needed, OL and WR. every WR not named Steve is a FA this offseason, and it needs some young studs added to the depth to make this team more complete. lets please stop ignoring the fact that  big men allow you to compete, but so do athletic guys on the outside(TD makers) i expect(hope) this team looks at multiple OL and WR next year in the draft.

 

other names

 Brandon Coleman Rutgers

Devante Parker Louisville

Rashad Greene FSU

Marqise Lee USC

Kelvin Benjamin FSU

Devin Smith OSU

Kasen Williams Washington

Paul Richardson Colorado

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one hand, we have guys here that rave about how Cam set all kinds of records in passing his first two seasons.  Then, we turn around and say that WR is our main need.  Where did all the All Pro receivers Cam used in his first two seasons go?  OR, is it something else?

 

I dare say, the OLine is should be our priority.  Have an incredible run game and make people bring 8 in the box, and a ton of WR's will be open.

 

Sorry, you have a good list, but I am still all about the lines,  We did the DLine thing last draft and it seems to be working out.  Now, lets go out and the the same on the OLine.

 

I do understand the Smith is getting a bit older and we will need a number one at some point, but if we don't fix the line, it won't matter.  Remember, Gross is not the youngest thing either

 

I could not agree with you more, but here is my thinking on WR:

Lafell, Edwards, Hixon, Ginn--all are in contract years.  I do not see anyone other than Ginn getting a long-term deal unless they surprise everyone.

Smitty is 34.  He should have hit the wall already.  WRs take time to develop.

 

If a stud LT is there in the first round, you take the OT.  LTs are more "rare" that WRs.  In addition, the WRs usually take a year or two to develop, so maybe free agency is the best place to find a WR---however, #1 WRs in free agency are rare,

 

I think we could find some talent in the second round at WR-- I think, by the time the dust settles this year, there will be 10-12 WRs gone in the first 2 days.  I would say that nearly all of them will be better than what we had to pick from this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

both is needed, OL and WR. every WR not named Steve is a FA this offseason, and it needs some young studs added to the depth to make this team more complete. lets please stop ignoring the fact that  big men allow you to compete, but so do athletic guys on the outside(TD makers) i expect(hope) this team looks at multiple OL and WR next year in the draft.

 

other names

 Brandon Coleman Rutgers

Devante Parker Louisville

Rashad Greene FSU

Marqise Lee USC

Kelvin Benjamin FSU

Devin Smith OSU

Kasen Williams Washington

Paul Richardson Colorado

 

Yes.  I did not read this before responding to Stirs, but your list (I scratched Lee because he was mentioned as the third best WR in my post)  Shows that there are several WRs who will go in the first 2 rounds. A dozen is my guess--if that happens, 19% of the picks would be WR.  Since I expect at least 5 tackles and 5 QBs taken during that time, I am suggesting that the draft at WR will be deep--extending into the third round with quality players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.  I did not read this before responding to Stirs, but your list (I scratched Lee because he was mentioned as the third best WR in my post)  Shows that there are several WRs who will go in the first 2 rounds. A dozen is my guess--if that happens, 19% of the picks would be WR.  Since I expect at least 5 tackles and 5 QBs taken during that time, I am suggesting that the draft at WR will be deep--extending into the third round with quality players.

 

if the JRs come out, this class could be very top heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watkins- I'm really high on this kid. Great hands and speed. I would say if we go 9-7 to 7-9 we could have a chance of him falling to us until the combine. He should blow it up. Top 10 pick

 

Lee- This guy is good too. Very big and physical receiver. To me he's a young, faster Bolden. Another top 10 pick.

 

Evans- I watched the Bama game yesterday and he dominated. He's a HUGE WR. Something like 6'6 250. The only thing against him is his speed. If you go back and watch the Bama game he made all the catches but always had a db all over him. While it was awesome for him to still make the catches, I don't see him making all of those, much less the majority against NFL starting dbs. I'd loved to see if he could translate into a TE though. Late first round pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the rate we're at, I'm thinking yet again our pick will be around the 8-12 area.  I'd like to think at least 1 of Lee, Watkins, Evans would be there for us.  If not, I'm looking at Matthews, Coleman, Robinson, Moncrief who all would start over LaFell their first game.  We need to position ourselves for at the very least a WR2 upgrade.  Maybe go after a shifty slot guy as well.  

 

If the top-3 are gone, I'd consider Seferian-Jenkins at TE.  Amazing athleticism and a Graham-esque ceiling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You want Josh McDaniels to be our Head Coach so all your narratives need to end 
    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...