Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this D better than the 2003 Super Bowl defense?


CharlottePanther

Recommended Posts

2002 vs 2003

2002 allowed less yards per game, less pts per game and had more takeaways........and was paired with a weaker O than 03.

2002 is the bar, not 2003.

2002

290.4 yards per game

18.9 pts per game

33 takeaways

2013 - currently

299 yards per game

13.6 pts per game

on pace for 35 takeaways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said our D sucks? Where did I say that? All I am saying is we don't need Denver as a gauge because the Bills were able to hang enough points on our ass to win

isn't that what you're saying? You said you dont need to see us play denver to gauge the d, because it wasn't even good enough to hold off the bills

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corner was a weak spot in 03 with cousin and Reggie Howard. Ricky Manning had an unbelievable playoff run but they weren't great. I think the secondary is a toss up but give the edge to '03 with minter.

LBs are equal. Morgan and Witherspoon were of course solid but Greg Favors got major playing time on that team.

That front 4 was better and we had depth. Burton and Al Wallace could have started for most other teams in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...