Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Mikell help us Sunday like Blackburn did against the Giants?


panthers55

Recommended Posts

One of the things that fans may forget is that Quinton Mikell played for the Rams last year.  He was their third leading tackler garnering 114 tackles and 3 sacks. 

 

It seemed like Blackburn was in the backfield when we played the Giants because he knew their plays and what they wanted to do.  I wonder if that could help us Sunday given Mikell knows the Rams offense.

 

Sure I know folks will say that this happens all the time and it doesn't really make that much of a difference but if we were playing the Giants this weekend, would them having Beason make a difference?  Will the fact that Mikell knows what plays they run out of the formations help him know where to play.  Sure we know that coaches watch film and have already told folks what the Rams will do and how to respond. So the scouting aspect is not that big a deal.  Still when a player is very familiar with another team scheme they can individually play faster and respond instead of think about it and then responding. Plus he will be motivated to show them what he has left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CRA is right, very little chance he can offer anything in the way of schematics. however he has faced most of those offensive guys before in practice, so he's going to be the guy most familiar with their personnel. hopefully he'll be able to offer a little bit there to give us an edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rams have a new DC....so I would think that would rule him out knowing the inside and out like Chase with the NY D

Defending the Rams O....may help some. Mikell is a pretty savy

I'm sure the OP was talking about him helping vs the Rams' offense. That's who he would be going against, not the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if anything Mikel is a liability for us going into the game. If anybody knows his tendencies and weaknesses it's the Rams!

There's a reason he's not a Ram, and I'm not buying the whole "salary cap" reason either.

It will be awesome to see Tavon Austin finally have a break out game against US of all people. (Huddle will implode about why we didn't draft Austin and why we still don't have a compliment to Smitty) Rams win this one in a blowout due to Mikel being burnt continuously in play action by Austin.

(Note: every win we have has been after I post something like this... So here's to hoping that it keeps working)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the OP was talking about him helping vs the Rams' offense. That's who he would be going against, not the defense.

OP mentioned both sides....

Chase likely did help with both sides. He could aid Cam/Shula with what NY does defensively.

I mean traditionally, that is where former players aid the most. Helping provide insight on what they did on their side of the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that he gives us much of an edge in scouting information since honestly coaches have broken down game tape from this year and we know what they will do and this has been passed along to players in meeting and practice.  What I was mostly focusing on (or thought I was) was on whether playing every day against the Rams offense last year would give him a personal advantage in knowing what was coming and what Bradford would do or which guys he favors in what situations. Plus would he be especially motivated to play well and show the Rams what he had left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that he gives us much of an edge in scouting information since honestly coaches have broken down game tape from this year and we know what they will do and this has been passed along to players in meeting and practice. What I was mostly focusing on (or thought I was) was on whether playing every day against the Rams offense last year would give him a personal advantage in knowing what was coming and what Bradford would do or which guys he favors in what situations. Plus would he be especially motivated to play well and show the Rams what he had left.

I would not be shocked to see him come up and step in front of some of Bradford short work for a INT.

Mikell is smart. I am sure he knows lots of Bradford's habits....Bradford has been playing small ball for some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

blackburn did help a lot with scouting the giants O. he knew what they were going to do pretty much at all times and he helped the rest of the D know it.

 

i fully expect mikell to help us know how to work the rams offense. the guy is smart. he may not know their O as well as blackburn did, but that's only because blackburn spent more time in NY.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...