Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most important man Sunday


CRA

Recommended Posts

i think we always need a big game from our oline, all of them to have a chance

Bell seems to be the biggest X factor though IMO.  He either gets beat like a drum all day or plays okay.  He doesn't seem to just get beat here or there like most of our lineman might.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any word if Chris Long is going to play Sunday? Could be a big homecoming for Robert Quinn on Sunday. 

Long is playing.  Sure sounded like it in his presser yesterday.   They have two good DEs...which means Bell will have a bad matchup every snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they need to scheme to give Bell some help on a fairly regular basis.

Agreed.  No reason they can't let the tight end chip him a bit or have the running back help out.  The problem will be when they blitz and they will.  Still we did a pretty good job against Minnesota and they blitzed on a bunch of plays.  We seem susceptible to the delayed blitz where the DE goes wide and the safety or linebacker comes up the hole created between the guard and tackle.  that is normally the running back's job to pick up but if he helps Bell, there is a hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i really hope shula uses deanglo on chip blocks before releasing out into the flats on passing downs. we effectively neutralized the vikings pass rush that way last week and cam looked damn efficient on dump-offs and screens when he got in trouble (which subsequently opened things up downfield on the longer throws.)

 

this game rests as much on shula and his scheme/gameplan as it does byron bell IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. No reason they can't let the tight end chip him a bit or have the running back help out. The problem will be when they blitz and they will. Still we did a pretty good job against Minnesota and they blitzed on a bunch of plays. We seem susceptible to the delayed blitz where the DE goes wide and the safety or linebacker comes up the hole created between the guard and tackle. that is normally the running back's job to pick up but if he helps Bell, there is a hole.

Pretty much.

They could go 'max protect' but I don't think our receiving corps is good enough that we can do that very much and expect success.

Shula went with a 'quick pass' approach last game (smart move when your O-Line isn't exactly dominant). That's more appropos of a WCO than a Coryell but if they can continue being successful that way, I'm for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you scared of the pass rush.. then the most important guy would be DeAngelo.. if he gets going.. then it should slow down the rush.. 

Important for him to be consistent.....no negative runs.  That was a big issue against AZ.  Once the run disappeared we were in 3rd and longs all game.  The reason AZ was teeing off on us is b/c we were in 3rd and longs all 2nd half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i really hope shula uses deanglo on chip blocks before releasing out into the flats on passing downs. we effectively neutralized the vikings pass rush that way last week and cam looked damn efficient on dump-offs and screens when he got in trouble (which subsequently opened things up downfield on the longer throws.)

 

this game rests as much on shula and his scheme/gameplan as it does byron bell IMO

 

Screw it.....just line Harsock's ass up beside Bell all game long and double team the DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...