Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McDermott and Shula


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

Our defense is a top 5 defense and our offense is now becoming very steady and productive.

 

As coaches on the hot seat lose their jobs you gotta wonder if these two will become candidates for head coaching jobs.

 

The last time we had a top ranked defense (2nd I believe in 2002) we lost Jack Del Rio our DC to Jacksonville.

 

Right now I believe McDermott has a huge upside but might be too young to run a team.  Mike Shula is a retread and might get a look.

 

Now to my question.  If we lose either of these coaches, who replaces them. 

 

Defensively I would like to see Wilks get the job.  I think hiring up the current staff gives us the best opportunity to keep the same scheme and defensive playbook.

 

Offensively replacing Shula from within would be tougher than the defensive side of the ball.  Mainly because Shula was brought up from the Chudz staff and the playbook is basically the same.  Though Shula is not as high octane as Chudz was, I like the efficiency. (getting better I should say)

 

Would you choose from within or go outside the organization for someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My God...they've only won 3 games. You would think the Panther's had just won the SB.

 

I don't think anyone is going to be knocking on the doors to hire them away at this point. MAYBE in a year or two but only if they prove they can produce consistently.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My God...they've only won 3 games. You would think the Panther's had just won the SB.

 

I don't think anyone is going to be knocking on the doors to hire them away at this point. MAYBE in a year or two but only if they prove they can produce consistently.

 

I NEVER IMPLIED WE WON THE SUPER BOWL.  You don't have to win the Super Bowl to lose a coordinator.   Chudz in Cleveland is a prime example.   He was also interviewed after Cam's rookie year but didn't get a position.

 

Jack Del Rio was our defensive coordinator for ONE season but ranked #2 we are currently #3.  McDermott is young and the defense has been solid all year.   Don't think for one second teams with coaches on the hot seat don't notice this.

 

Shula I would agree but if Shula puts us on the positive side of the W/L record.  His name will surface too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't think McDermott's ready to be a head coach.

Not even close and I don't think he is interested right now . He was completely overwhelmed when he was thrown into the role of DC when Johnson passed away. McDermott needs a few more years under his belt to build his resume and is in a great spot right now and I think he knows it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...