Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Harris (ESPN): "Cam Newton is good. His receivers aren't"


top dawg

Recommended Posts

While perusing BYE week options in fantasy, I happened upon this synopsis of Cam and the WR corps by Christopher Harris:

 

 Cam Newton is good. His receivers aren't: Watching Ted Ginn and Brandon LaFell play football is just painful. They can get open with the best of them. But week after week after week we have to watch these wideouts drop catchable passes. Ginn had a perfectly thrown bomb go directly through his arms on what would've been a long touchdown. LaFell ran a lovely dig route in the third quarter and Newton stuck it on him, and it ricocheted off his chest. These are not one-time events, and if you're looking for a reason Newton hasn't taken that proverbial "next step" as a passer, that's it. Newton is on a ridiculous three-week streak, during which he's gone 58-for-75 (77.3 percent completion rate) for 667 yards, six TDs and zero INTs, and Thursday night against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, he rushed for his second TD in his past three games, making his fantasy night. Steve Smith? He's still really good, but even he's had some drop problems. Yet the biggest failing of Panthers management past and present is failing to surround Big Cam with a viable stable of supporting wideouts. When they struggle, when Newton struggles, it's almost always because better defenses take away Smith, and nobody else can win consistently.

 

 

I said to myself, "Wait a minute. Isn't this supposed to be about fantasy football?"  The truth is that it hit a little close to home (Ouch). But, at the same time---after I had thought about it---I had to grin at dudes frankness and succinctness. In this instance, fantasy is close to reality, but as long as we keep winning, who is really gonna care?  There is some irony, in that we keep on winning notwithstanding management's "biggest failing".  Cam and the coaches are doing a helluva job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lafell...No excuse, then again that was the knock on him coming out of colege if I recall. Small hands.

Steve. IDK what is up with him this year. I don't want to say the "lost a step" thing just yet c/ I said that before Cam came, and then he blew that out of the water. However if I'm being honest he's not the same home run hitter with that dangerous threat for YAC. He's had a few crucial drops, but Smith is still Smith and I'm sure he's getting plenty of attention+  Cam spreading the ball around more+ Finally having a good receiving core. Thus the production drop from Smith. But Steve is still great, just lacks the break away ability that I'd grown accustomed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Ginn only have 1 drop so far after 7 games. That's not bad. Now, LaFell is "bad". The dude is so inconsistent and drops ball almost every week. That's just who he is. Me personally, I dont want him back after this season unless he is our no4 receiver. Ginn is legit as the no3. We need a true no1: Nicks, Gordon, Lee, Watkins, or Evans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some truth to it but Sam Bradford, Russel Wilson, Kaepernick (thus far), and Tom Brady don't have much to throw to either.

 

Olsen has some talent, Smith is a solid vet, Ginn is a deep threat and LaFell provides a balanced option. Work with what you have. Maybe we can draft a great WR (first since Smith?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam is completing 77% of his passes someone has to be catching the ball.

 

Yeah, Ginn dropped a huge deep ball but he also caught 5 or 6 for 80 yards. WR's drop balls, it happens.

 

QB occasionally overthrow passes and WR's drop the ball once and awhile, welcome to football.

 

Cam is completing 77% on third down, 80% on 3rd and long, a ridiculous 92% on 3rd and 11+ yards, id say his receivers are stepping up when called upon.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think our receiving corp is underrated. Cam has enough weapons. LaFell has had a couple of bad drops the last few games, but he also has had some big catches and he is consistently getting open. Plus, he is a top 10 blocking WR. I don't understand the LaFell hatred.

Saying Cam has no weapons is a lazy argument. The games the offense didnt score (Seattle & Arizona) were on the Oline more than the WR in my opinion.

Maybe I have just followed the team too long and base my expectations accordingly. This receiving corp is well above a lot the Panthers have fielded. The only years that even jump out to me as better are '99 & '03 and maybe '08 with Smitty/Moose and '11 with what Shockey/Olsen & Smitty brought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...