Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PS4 or Xbox1?


chubs2496

Recommended Posts

A couple of interesting posts from kotaku regarding the next gens.

CoD: Ghosts between current gen and ps4

http://kotaku.com/youtube-link-is-down-but-heres-the-ign-link-http-www-1459097686

And another that I agree with about "resolution-gate "

http://kotaku.com/the-xbox-one-and-ps4-arent-even-out-yet-lets-be-cool-1459116995?utm_campaign=Socialflow_Kotaku_Twitter&utm_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow

As far as the steambox, I want to see more. Steam is great for what it is, but will a steambox have the same entertainment value you get out the current consoles? Right now it's a no. Have to see what happens as it matures.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't think you can even begin to compare it to current gen or next gen consoles.  Its certainly unfair to the consoles.

 

Well of course!  I mean the Steambox is a modular PC.  You can put your own parts in it (from what I've read online).  So you can put some beastly AMD or Nvidia card, SSD, uber processor.  It's custom, and therefore a different income model.  The mainstream video game consoles are built differently so that M$ and $ony can sell them as cheaply by volume and still get the "next gen" thingie.

 

I am very interested in the steambox platform, but right now with it's lack of mainstream media usage (netflix, pictures, videos from my phone, ect), it's in a different classification from a PS4/X1.  After all, why not just build a gaming rig that hooks up to your TV?  You can still steam it, but also have your regular OS that can do the rest of the stuff that SteamOS can't do.

 

It's going to be interesting to see if the folks behind it are able to differentiate themselves from Sony, MS, and even Nintindo in this current game cycle.  Lord knows, we need more competition!

 

Pardon me while I got play some games on my phone =P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was leaning toward PS4 but now will go and get an XBOX1.

I play Madden or what ever football will come out and the new PS4 controllers do not have analog buttons. That is important in Madden bc it a tap of the button will lob the football and holding it down will bullet pass it. The PS4 controller will not be able to distinguish holding or tapping....like ur mom.

Not too many other games utilize the analog abilities of the controllers so PS4 moved away from seeing it as a need.

I am intrigued by the media dedication of the XBOX after they revamped that initial disasterous reveal presentation where the policies were horrible.

XBOX online is so much smoother and if I will have to pay for online play I will go with the better online experience as PSN online has so much lag and unresolved issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well of course!  I mean the Steambox is a modular PC.  You can put your own parts in it (from what I've read online).  So you can put some beastly AMD or Nvidia card, SSD, uber processor.  It's custom, and therefore a different income model.  The mainstream video game consoles are built differently so that M$ and $ony can sell them as cheaply by volume and still get the "next gen" thingie.

 

I am very interested in the steambox platform, but right now with it's lack of mainstream media usage (netflix, pictures, videos from my phone, ect), it's in a different classification from a PS4/X1.  After all, why not just build a gaming rig that hooks up to your TV?  You can still steam it, but also have your regular OS that can do the rest of the stuff that SteamOS can't do.

 

It's going to be interesting to see if the folks behind it are able to differentiate themselves from Sony, MS, and even Nintindo in this current game cycle.  Lord knows, we need more competition!

 

Pardon me while I got play some games on my phone =P

 

If you want, you can dual boot.  You can build your own Steam Machine and put Steam OS on it.  They're even going to release the CAD specs so you can build a case exactly like theirs.

 

You can also buy a low end Steam Machine to stream games from your gaming rig.

 

Steam Machine will work with netflix, etc. Steam OS will be open source, so there is no limit to its potential.  I don't really use Microsoft Office.  The only reason I'm married to Windows is Direct X.

 

I'm looking for some Steam Machines with AMD processors and Radeon cards that will not only blow away Xbox One and PS4 in performance, but also undercut their prices by 50-100$.

 

Plus Steam Machine will launch with a catalog that's 300 games large.  No other next gen console can claim that.

 

The big obstacle will be getting directx to work on a linux platform, but I'm pretty sure they're going to fix that, which will bring the Steam Machine's catalog to over 3000 games.

 

Also, the ultimate in backwards compatibility.  I can play games that are 3 generations old on my pc, if I choose to do so.

 

Console manufacturers don't use specialized hardware to save money.  It actually costs them extra to do so.  They're taking a loss on the hardware.  They do it so they can keep their share of the market on lockdown.  It won't be just Steam making Steam Machines, it will be multiple manufacturers producing them, and they will be in competition with each other.  I expect there to be Asus Steam Machines, Gateway Steam Machines, etc.

 

And yes, you can upgrade them if you choose to do so.  I won't be buying one, but I will be going dual boot once Steam OS will play Direct X games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brother re-check that guarantee...my page shows 30mill.....thats means he's staying in my book for at least til the end of 2026.  Im going to be my normal honest self, besides watching like half of the SB, I didn't know the guy. My guess is Panthers have a "planned model of paying players" and they almost had to spend a chunk of space on a DLman after Dbrown injury season gave them a nightmare out-come of worst D in NFL scoring. Once Milton got above Dbrown payments, they went with the plan B. A player whom the "co-GM" put his name with. Brad said turk would not be a problem off-field and leader, which the Panthers need badly. I dug in with the google-fu, I found out  I also found him playing lots of NT, which was shocking given the small frame. He seems ready for a bigger role and had a great SB too. IDK, I feel Dan Morgan was dead set on not going into this season without more DL depth and its there. The real deal is this, nearly all FA take one year to "adjust". I think turk is trying too hard and causing injuries as a result for his contract. Dbrown called turk "strong as hell" and I know for a fact Dbrowns has insane core and strength numbers. They lift together with the 50 LB difference...... you always lift with a guy who's similar in strength cause you can leave on the 8 wheels, let the other guy lift while you rest and go after him.  I do wish he had a better beginning to his panther career, 3 games for him to do so and it would cover up the low points if he made a few plays.... Again it felt like they almost had to make move/spend $$$ and Morgan was going to have DL depth this season no matter what...My best guess. 
    • There's a reason DC wasn't getting calls to be a HC. He wasn't ready. His indecisiveness is infuriating. His lack of awareness is mystifying. He jumped at the chance to grab the David Tepper retirement plan and who can really blame him. Maybe with time he can grow into the job. But we're on year 8 of our 7 year rebuild. I think I'm gonna need a hip replacement before we get a decent HC. 
×
×
  • Create New...