Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A few key plays


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

1) One that will get overlooked is Luke's one on one coverage on the deep play. Looked like a sure catch that could have been the ballgame and Luke get's his hand in there and knocks it away. Great play.

 

2) The incomplete fumble. I guess I'm a homer but he had control, two feet down, made a football move etc... shouldn't that have been a fumble?

 

3) Stewart's fumble. Nothing much to note as the RB core did well all around and it didn't hurt us. BUT Stewart has fumbled at around twice the rate as Williams over his career. Stewart is now getting the bulk of carries and he will have to hold onto the ball if we make a playoff run.

 

4) Gano's 53 yarder. Had his first miss this year but this guy is still clutch from long range now 5-5 from over 50. Don't be surprised if he gets a shot at a 60 yarder this year. Probably could make one from 70.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been watching football thoroughly for almost 2 decades and I have never seen a worse call then the incomplete/fumble call.

Maybe the fail Mary just because of the implications, but good god that was absolutely terrible. A travesty of officiating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one that was big IMO....the Tolbert smearing of Reid.

 

That kind of hit/power, scares guys, I don't care what they say.

 

 

That hit was amazing and Tolbert was very classy checking on him after.

 

He literally ktfo'd that guy.

 

 

Also my dad and I both (he's a skins fan) thought that was a catch and fumble.  Horrible call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
    • Seems to be the consensus from the talking heads. I really wish we had double dipped at center in the 2nd round. Sion will never play in the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...