Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith milestone watch


panthers04100

Recommended Posts

Thumbs Up to Smitty, GREAT going on 12k in some very elite company now, but wait you been ELITE since you been here in one way or another!!!

The Card game has perplexed a number of folks that watched it.  We went in at half time with 3 to 1 Time of Possession.  We came out after half and every one was out of gas is a good way to look at it I guess.  I called that game a Reality Check.  They knew they had it won to bad the Cards didn't!!

 

GOOOOOOOOOO Panthers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

post-1539-0-74784000-1384555862_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thumbs Up to Smitty, GREAT going on 12k in some very elite company now, but wait you been ELITE since you been here in one way or another!!!

The Card game has perplexed a number of folks that watched it. We went in at half time with 3 to 1 Time of Possession. We came out after half and every one was out of gas is a good way to look at it I guess. I called that game a Reality Check. They knew they had it won to bad the Cards didn't!!

GOOOOOOOOOO Panthers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Card game has perplexed a number of folks that watched it. We went in at half time with 3 to 1 Time of Possession. We came out after half and every one was out of gas is a good way to look at it I guess. I called that game a Reality Check. They knew they had it won to bad the Cards didn't!!

GOOOOOOOOOO Panthers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that would be so awesome. he's gonna have a hell of a challenge with talib on the field

if they are using Talib to track Smitty, might indicate they are playing a lot of man coverage, and we know we fugz people up trying to play man too much.  teams who turn their backs on Cam, they pay for it.  They may try to use fat Spikes as a spy but I think Cam will get by him when needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

smitty put up 69 against a rock solid san francisco defense last week... and that's after dropping that deep 30-yarder that would've put him up over 100.

 

if he can mirror that performance (minus the drop) this week he could finally make it happen. it's been a long time coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
    • I have no problem drafting a WR, even as high as the 2nd, but I do have an issue with using a precious 1st rounder on it. Another WR is a need, but we also have a lot of other needs, and the goal should always be to draft 1st rounders that you expect to be on the team for 10 years if they stay healthy. In regards to Coker, one of two things happen.  He keeps getting better and becomes our legit #2 to T-Mac and we have to pay him accordingly, or he doesn’t. If he does, then using that 1st rounder on a WR this year was dumb.  If he doesn’t, then drafting a WR in the 1st this year would be smart, but then so would trading Coker when his perceived value would be at its highest. If we were already had a SB contending roster, then yes, a 1st Round WR to put us over the top makes sense, but we just have too many holes to fill to use it that way… again, unless the staff just doesn’t believe in Coker’s ability to become a true #2, which I think he really can be.
×
×
  • Create New...